[Cz-computers] Feedback on DNS and related series articles

[Howard C. Berkowitz]

Let me say that I fully understand that new requirements are making twisty
and turny interconnections among DNS, IPv6, DHCP, minimal PKI for DNSSEC
versus full use of DNS as a PKI repository, etc.

 

At this point, I would like feedback about anything that really should be in
the [[Domain Name System]] article and is not, and those things that are too
detailed for this top-level article, which I'd like to move toward approval
- assuming there's anyone else to approve it.  [[Internet protocol]] (NOT
the IPv4 and IPv6 below it) and [[Anycast]] also need pre-approval feedback.

 

DNSSEC is truly a mess; I've been getting great help from my colleague,
Ronald Nsubuga. I will be doing some major overhauls in the next few days;
right now, I'm fighting a corrupted XP Pro SP3. SP3 is evil, I think. It's
especially evil if you innocently install it on a HP machine and then find
HP doesn't support it. 

 

Howard

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.citizendium.org/pipermail/cz-computers/attachments/20081008/5340d16c/attachment.html