[Cz-editcouncil] Article deletion question

[Richard Jensen]

1) In terms of policy, lacking a well-formed Economics groups the
editorial council should decide. (If we did have an Econ group it
should decide but perhaps there should be an appeal mechanism that an
author can take to the editorial council).
2) the article itself is poor quality.  Its advocacy is strident. It
makes wild claims that only a handful of faithful followers seem to
support.  It is vague and imprecise about what the topic actually is,
what research and data is used, what results have been found, where the
field is headed, and especially how it deals with criticism.
3) I recommend deletion. (and it can be saved for internal archives. 20
years from now historians will want to know how CZ solved its early
problems.) ~~~~