[Cz-editcouncil] 30 hour minimum?

[David Goodman]

That's me. I suggested it because it fits normal patterns for people
with other responsibilities. One day I may work on Citizendium
starting at 6 PM, the next day at 9. If something was proposed at 7 PM
the first day I'd never see it.
Being on the EC is a major responsibility, and we all should have
realized we'd need to connect every day or so, and spend a substantial
amount of time on it, but a literal 24 hrs is more suitable for
full-time CZ administrators, which most of us are not.  --
DavidGoodman

On 5/5/07, Robert M Cutler <rmc at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> I am travelling and conventioneering for the next month and online only
> sporadically. Please do not take any non-participation as an indicator of
> disinterest.
>
> Robert Cutler
>
> On May 05, Larry Sanger wrote:
> > Could the person who suggested that we make the minimum time for voting on
> > relatively insignificant motions 30 hours, instead of 24, please contact me?
> > I forget who it was and I can't find the comment itself.  The question I
> > want to ask is why 30 hours should be regarded as more fair than 24 hours.
> > Since in any 24 hour period there is going to be an equal amount of time of
> > activity around the globe...
> >
> > --Larry
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cz-editcouncil mailing list
> > Cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org
> > http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-editcouncil
> _______________________________________________
> Cz-editcouncil mailing list
> Cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org
> http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-editcouncil
>


-- 
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.