[Cz-editcouncil] 30 hour minimum?

[Robert P. Tito]

To prevent any misunderstanding and allow all to have time to  
respond, it's yae to 60

Rob
On 6-May, 2007, 5:09, at 5:09:47 , David Shapinsky wrote:

> Hello again -
>
> If everyone else accepts this approach then I'm comfortable with  
> any of the
> proposed hours.  And maybe then we can move on.
>
> Should someone make specific proposals that we can yea, nea?   
> Perhaps those
> who feel most strongly about a certain # of hours -- 60, 48, or  
> whatever --
> maximum?  I'd like to know that we had addressed the concerns of those
> people who felt most strongly about this.
>
> Cheers
> david
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cz-editcouncil-bounces at voltaire.citizendium.org
> [mailto:cz-editcouncil-bounces at voltaire.citizendium.org] On Behalf  
> Of Robert
> P. Tito
> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 8:07 PM
> To: The Citizendium Editorial Council
> Subject: Re: [Cz-editcouncil] 30 hour minimum?
>
> All,
>
> let the proponent ask for a certain urgency. The chair then can
> determine, OK, longer-shorter.
> Rob
> On 6-May, 2007, 1:56, at 1:56:06 , David Shapinsky wrote:
>
>> Makes some sense to me so long as we have provisions for making
>> decisions in
>> a shorter time-frame if necessary.  Perhaps a range -- minimum and
>> maximum
>> -- with the chair given the option to determine the urgency?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cz-editcouncil-bounces at voltaire.citizendium.org
>> [mailto:cz-editcouncil-bounces at voltaire.citizendium.org] On Behalf
>> Of Robert
>> P. Tito
>> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 5:27 PM
>> To: The Citizendium Editorial Council
>> Subject: Re: [Cz-editcouncil] 30 hour minimum?
>>
>> All,
>>
>> In that case the more logical time period to choose would then be
>> either 48 or 60 hours - allowing for a possible hiatus in log on
>> time. Where the more logical time would be 2 days and allowing for
>> the timezones 2.5 days, respectively 48 and 60 hours. In that way you
>> always have a minimum of 1 day to lapse and 1 day to respond. time
>> enough to do so. 24 hours might be a very (or too) short period
>> actually and for many reasons not always practical.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Rob
>> On 5-May, 2007, 23:05, at 23:05:01 , David Goodman wrote:
>>
>>> That's me. I suggested it because it fits normal patterns for people
>>> with other responsibilities. One day I may work on Citizendium
>>> starting at 6 PM, the next day at 9. If something was proposed at
>>> 7 PM
>>> the first day I'd never see it.
>>> Being on the EC is a major responsibility, and we all should have
>>> realized we'd need to connect every day or so, and spend a
>>> substantial
>>> amount of time on it, but a literal 24 hrs is more suitable for
>>> full-time CZ administrators, which most of us are not.  --
>>> DavidGoodman
>>>
>>> On 5/5/07, Robert M Cutler <rmc at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>>> I am travelling and conventioneering for the next month and online
>>>> only
>>>> sporadically. Please do not take any non-participation as an
>>>> indicator of
>>>> disinterest.
>>>>
>>>> Robert Cutler
>>>>
>>>> On May 05, Larry Sanger wrote:
>>>>> Could the person who suggested that we make the minimum time for
>>>>> voting on
>>>>> relatively insignificant motions 30 hours, instead of 24, please
>>>>> contact me?
>>>>> I forget who it was and I can't find the comment itself.  The
>>>>> question I
>>>>> want to ask is why 30 hours should be regarded as more fair than
>>>>> 24 hours.
>>>>> Since in any 24 hour period there is going to be an equal amount
>>>>> of time of
>>>>> activity around the globe...
>>>>>
>>>>> --Larry
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Cz-editcouncil mailing list
>>>>> Cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org
>>>>> http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-editcouncil
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cz-editcouncil mailing list
>>>> Cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org
>>>> http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-editcouncil
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cz-editcouncil mailing list
>>> Cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org
>>> http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-editcouncil
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cz-editcouncil mailing list
>> Cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org
>> http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-editcouncil
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cz-editcouncil mailing list
>> Cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org
>> http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-editcouncil
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cz-editcouncil mailing list
> Cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org
> http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-editcouncil
> _______________________________________________
> Cz-editcouncil mailing list
> Cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org
> http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-editcouncil
>