[Cz-editcouncil] Experimental "Stub Week"
Regina Bouillon
Efua1 at web.de
Mon Nov 5 09:18:02 CST 2007
I like the idea of motivating authors in that way. The threshold should be low at the start.
Regina
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: The Citizendium Editorial Council <cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org>
> Gesendet: 05.11.07 16:06:37
> An: "'The Citizendium Editorial Council'" <cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org>
> Betreff: [Cz-editcouncil] Experimental "Stub Week"
>
> Editorial Council members,
>
> If there are no objections, I would like to do a *strictly* one-week-long
> experiment: "Stub Week." For one week, people would be not only permitted
> but *encouraged* to start very short articles on, basically, everything. I
> do suggest a two-sentence minimum in any case, and more than that is, of
> course, still gratefully accepted. Also, all stub articles should be marked
> as such.
>
> Here is why I'd like to do this. It has been suggested that loosening the
> rules about "stubs," i.e., very short articles, would motivate people to
> start more articles, expand more (short) articles, and in general get more
> involved. The rule against stubs sets a relatively high bar for people to
> get started: they can't simply write a few sentences, they have to write a
> few *paragraphs*. But this means that a lot of relatively impatient--but
> still perfectly competent--people aren't getting involved. That, anyway, is
> the argument. Frankly, I think there might be something to it. After all,
> we might rope a lot more people in who are willing to write a few stubs, and
> then come back (in curiosity) to see if they've been improved by anyone.
> This *could* have the effect of not only creating more content, but getting
> more people to write in the first place and for stick around for longer.
>
> I feel comfortable asking for approval "by acclamation" because this
> experiment will be *strictly* limited to one week. After this week is over,
> I will *insist* on taking a vote *if* we are to adopt a stub-friendly
> policy. If even before we take the vote there is considerable opposition,
> or if I myself decide I dislike the idea, then we wouldn't even take a vote.
> Furthermore, the resolution we vote on might be just for another, longer
> "pilot project" of a month.
>
> The Chair.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cz-editcouncil mailing list
> Cz-editcouncil at mail.citizendium.org
> http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-editcouncil
>
_______________________________________________________________________
Jetzt neu! Schützen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 3 Monate
kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?mc=022220
More information about the Cz-editcouncil
mailing list