[Cz-history] [Cz-military] [Cz-politics] Feedback and priorities? Anybodyout there?

[Roger A. Lohmann]

For those of you who aren't editors (and for editors reading in areas
outside our editorial briefs), Howard's comments point up the importance of
everyone in the CZ community participating in the process: If you spot what
seems an error in an article outside your usual areas of expertise but you
are hesitant about making a correction, comments on the the talk page (e.g.,
"<this point> doesn't seem right") can be useful contributions all by
themselves.

And, as CZ philosophy states, "...we'd love you to dive "write" in. We
especially don't want you to feel intimidated. For instance, you may imagine
we have impossibly high standards. Certainly we aim for high quality, but we
also want participation to be easy and as much fun as possible..."

Roger


On 5/26/09 10:17 AM, "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb at netcases.net> wrote:

> I was able to have an article approved, which fell into both Military and
> Engineering, by
> an Engineering Editor without specific knowledge of the issue, but the ability
> to
> recognize coherent Engineering writing -- and comments from two Author members
> that the
> details, from their direct experience, was correct.