[Cz-politics] 9/11 article

[Nick Gardner]

I agree with your comments, John. The congratulatory tone of the text -
whatever its merits - seems inappropriate to an encyclopedia article, and
is  apt to reduce its credibility.
Nick Gardner

On 08/11/2007, John Stephenson <citizendium at linguistics.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> History authors and editors, please have a look at the '9-11 Attack'
> article if you have time. There has been much debate about certain
> sections, particularly 'Immediate response' and the introduction.
>
> http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/9-11_Attack#Immediate_Response
> http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Talk:9-11_Attack#Immediate_response
>
> Basically, it was argued that it was biased, but editor Richard Jensen
> has put the original passage back in.
>
> Obviously this is a controversial article so there is a temptation to
> steer clear. However, so far it's only the work of a couple of people,
> and this is a wiki, so be bold!
>
> John.
> _______________________________________________
> Cz-politics mailing list
> Cz-politics at mail.citizendium.org
> http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-politics
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.citizendium.org/pipermail/cz-politics/attachments/20071108/ed21c951/attachment.html