Welcome to Citizendium: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

1 April 2008

31 March 2008

30 March 2008

29 March 2008

28 March 2008

  • curprev 21:3821:38, 28 March 2008imported>Anthony.Sebastianm 8,187 bytes +12 No edit summary
  • curprev 13:4113:41, 28 March 2008imported>Robert W King 8,175 bytes +459 I was wrong and didn't read the instructions...
  • curprev 13:3413:34, 28 March 2008imported>Robert W King 8,177 bytes +2 even though the article is in fact a draft, we nominate it based on it's quality not its status; hence the section below "New draft of the week."
  • curprev 13:3213:32, 28 March 2008imported>Alexander Wiebelm 8,175 bytes −2 the article of the week is a draft

26 March 2008

25 March 2008

24 March 2008

23 March 2008

22 March 2008

  • curprev 20:5620:56, 22 March 2008imported>Chris Day 7,821 bytes 0 No edit summary
  • curprev 17:0117:01, 22 March 2008imported>Hayford Peirce 7,821 bytes +9 Rewrote some of the Civil War stuff
  • curprev 16:4216:42, 22 March 2008imported>Anthony.Sebastian 7,812 bytes +308 Add quote to inspire author participation. Can anyone move quote to better fill blank area below quote? Can anyone make font sme as Workgroup titles above?
  • curprev 15:2215:22, 22 March 2008imported>Anthony.Sebastian 7,507 bytes −1 Move Image:Approved.png to more logical location

21 March 2008

20 March 2008

19 March 2008

  • curprev 17:3217:32, 19 March 2008imported>Hayford Peirce 7,414 bytes +3 I think three colons might improve the appearance: how's that for boldness?
  • curprev 15:2415:24, 19 March 2008imported>Hayford Peirce 7,411 bytes +53 changed a which to that
  • curprev 15:2115:21, 19 March 2008imported>Hayford Peirce 7,412 bytes +54 I think we should emphasize that we need both authors and editors and that they can be the same person in some cases
  • curprev 15:1815:18, 19 March 2008imported>Todd Coles 7,358 bytes +179 added a pic for Civil War
  • curprev 14:5914:59, 19 March 2008imported>Larry Sanger 7,179 bytes +41 No edit summary
  • curprev 14:4914:49, 19 March 2008imported>Larry Sanger 7,137 bytes −1 No edit summary
  • curprev 14:4814:48, 19 March 2008imported>Larry Sanger 7,138 bytes +123 No edit summary
  • curprev 14:4114:41, 19 March 2008imported>Larry Sanger 6,996 bytes −348 No edit summary
  • curprev 14:1814:18, 19 March 2008imported>Larry Sanger 6,998 bytes −398 No edit summary
  • curprev 14:1214:12, 19 March 2008imported>Larry Sanger 7,051 bytes −345 "Get involved" is vague; moving section up and simplifying
  • curprev 14:0514:05, 19 March 2008imported>Larry Sanger 7,396 bytes +52 mention of public + expert is absolutely essential
  • curprev 14:0214:02, 19 March 2008imported>Larry Sanger 7,344 bytes +25 Remove unnecessary (and too-many) italics; and claiming "we're credible" instead of what we aim at, is to invite sneering skepticism
  • curprev 14:0014:00, 19 March 2008imported>Hayford Peirce 7,360 bytes +41 minor rewriting
  • curprev 10:3110:31, 19 March 2008imported>Hayford Peirce 7,342 bytes +23 I restored 3 words that I think shouldn't have been edited out, otherwise I think it looks good! I wonder: should we say: "Vandalism non-existent"? Might attract ex-WPians...
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)