Talk:Games: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>David Martin No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I hope we'll be spelling out all such naming conventions soon. Most of WP's naming conventions are sensible, at least last time I saw them. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 21:20, 23 January 2007 (CST) | I hope we'll be spelling out all such naming conventions soon. Most of WP's naming conventions are sensible, at least last time I saw them. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 21:20, 23 January 2007 (CST) | ||
As the Workgroup is called Games, plural is the right form here. This is the entry article, after all! :-) [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 14:44, 25 January 2007 (CST) | |||
This is redundant information. I agree that it needs to be folded into the same article. The "Game" article is more developed and I think the singular is a more sensible name for the article. [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 21:27, 2 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:27, 2 April 2007
This should probably live at the singular version of the word, game. Similarly for points > point, etc.
I hope we'll be spelling out all such naming conventions soon. Most of WP's naming conventions are sensible, at least last time I saw them. --Larry Sanger 21:20, 23 January 2007 (CST)
As the Workgroup is called Games, plural is the right form here. This is the entry article, after all! :-) Nancy Sculerati MD 14:44, 25 January 2007 (CST)
This is redundant information. I agree that it needs to be folded into the same article. The "Game" article is more developed and I think the singular is a more sensible name for the article. David Martin 21:27, 2 April 2007 (CDT)