CZ Talk:Moderator Group/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephen Ewen (==Wording==) |
imported>Mike Johnson (Revising Constabulary Documents) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Wording== | ==Wording== | ||
"Abuse is dealt with much more strictly and harshly". We should not deal with things "harshly" but "forthrightly". The prior connotes ''tone'' of action, the latter ''manner'' of action. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 23:04, 26 February 2007 (CST) | "Abuse is dealt with much more strictly and harshly". We should not deal with things "harshly" but "forthrightly". The prior connotes ''tone'' of action, the latter ''manner'' of action. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 23:04, 26 February 2007 (CST) | ||
== Revising Constabulary Documents == | |||
Just a thought- should we look into creating /Draft versions of constabulary documents? It seems like we need these to be living documents with constant input and improvement, but also don't want stated CZ policy to be changed willy-nilly. Right now it seems they're simply 'protected'. I'm wondering if we could extend the approval process to policy, as well as articles (a draft page, CZ Policy tag/category, a reapproval process, etc). Thoughts? --[[User:Mike Johnson|Mike Johnson]] 18:50, 28 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 19:50, 28 February 2007
Someone could help out by making the "handy links for constables" into a nice table... --Larry Sanger 09:56, 15 February 2007 (CST)
Please tell something is being done about you know what. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 12:42, 15 February 2007 (CST)
Something is! --Larry Sanger 19:20, 15 February 2007 (CST)
Wording
"Abuse is dealt with much more strictly and harshly". We should not deal with things "harshly" but "forthrightly". The prior connotes tone of action, the latter manner of action. Stephen Ewen 23:04, 26 February 2007 (CST)
Revising Constabulary Documents
Just a thought- should we look into creating /Draft versions of constabulary documents? It seems like we need these to be living documents with constant input and improvement, but also don't want stated CZ policy to be changed willy-nilly. Right now it seems they're simply 'protected'. I'm wondering if we could extend the approval process to policy, as well as articles (a draft page, CZ Policy tag/category, a reapproval process, etc). Thoughts? --Mike Johnson 18:50, 28 February 2007 (CST)