Talk:Archive:The Big Write: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen No edit summary |
imported>Stephen Ewen No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I guess it's a request for a review, in that case. Sure, I don't see why not...it's just that, then, we need to tell editors that we want them to look over the requested articles to see if there are any they want to review, and we need to make rules for this sort of game. They won't be complicated, but then, the rules for the Big Write aren't complicated. Anyway, this could be a Big Review--which might end up being more successful than the Big Write. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 21:27, 23 February 2007 (CST) | I guess it's a request for a review, in that case. Sure, I don't see why not...it's just that, then, we need to tell editors that we want them to look over the requested articles to see if there are any they want to review, and we need to make rules for this sort of game. They won't be complicated, but then, the rules for the Big Write aren't complicated. Anyway, this could be a Big Review--which might end up being more successful than the Big Write. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 21:27, 23 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:My issue is to try to coordinate any articles authors write as those where editors exist who can review and perhaps approve them. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 21:29, 23 February 2007 (CST) | :My issue is to try to coordinate any articles authors write as those where editors exist who can review and perhaps approve them, as well as the other way around. In that way, the end result will hopefully be a larger number of articles from this initiative. :-) [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 21:29, 23 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 21:33, 23 February 2007
Can author's make requests?
Just that question. Stephen Ewen 19:19, 23 February 2007 (CST)
- Make them and see what happens :) Robert Tito | Talk 19:40, 23 February 2007 (CST)
- It might be a good idea to have a section in the Big Write page where authors can make 1 to 3 requests. While I would not wish to push for anything and thus color an editor's independent judgment in selecting their 3 to 5 articles, it could be helpful for editors in making their selections to see which articles present author's are willing to make credible starts on. This could be motivating for authors. ;-) I will put in for Globalization. I have another I could do but I know there is no editor yet present who could authenticate it. Stephen Ewen 19:42, 23 February 2007 (CST)
I guess it's a request for a review, in that case. Sure, I don't see why not...it's just that, then, we need to tell editors that we want them to look over the requested articles to see if there are any they want to review, and we need to make rules for this sort of game. They won't be complicated, but then, the rules for the Big Write aren't complicated. Anyway, this could be a Big Review--which might end up being more successful than the Big Write. --Larry Sanger 21:27, 23 February 2007 (CST)
- My issue is to try to coordinate any articles authors write as those where editors exist who can review and perhaps approve them, as well as the other way around. In that way, the end result will hopefully be a larger number of articles from this initiative. :-) Stephen Ewen 21:29, 23 February 2007 (CST)