Talk:South Carolina, History: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(avoid old fashioned terms, and avoid splitting SC articles)
imported>David Martin
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This article should be moved to [[History of South Carolina]] [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 22:27, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
This article should be moved to [[History of South Carolina]] [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 22:27, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
:No please, let's keep it here. There is no advantage in separating it from the future SC articles. Historians and publishers avoid the term, "History of XYZ" as old fashioned. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 23:29, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
:No please, let's keep it here. There is no advantage in separating it from the future SC articles. Historians and publishers avoid the term, "History of XYZ" as old fashioned. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 23:29, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
{{checklist
|                abc = South Carolina, History
|                cat1 = History
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = N
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = Y
|            cleanup = Y
|                  by = [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 19:27, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
}}

Revision as of 18:27, 14 May 2007

This article should be moved to History of South Carolina Russell Potter 22:27, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

No please, let's keep it here. There is no advantage in separating it from the future SC articles. Historians and publishers avoid the term, "History of XYZ" as old fashioned. Richard Jensen 23:29, 24 April 2007 (CDT)


Article Checklist for "South Carolina, History"
Workgroup category or categories History Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by David Martin 19:27, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.