Talk:Commonwealth of Nations: Difference between revisions
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>Nick Gardner (→Neglected article: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== Neglected article == | |||
This article has been allowed to remain in the present incomplete state for over four years. I suggest that in order to meet the minimum standard to be expected of a CZ article, it should provide such basic information as the aims, rules and activities of the organisation that it describes, and should back its statements with citations. I have not made any changes myself, except to change "sometimes known" to "formerly known" in the lede (it is true that some people incorrectly call the Commonwealth the "British Commonwealth", but to say so without qualification is to imply that it is correct to do so) and to change the membership from 53 to 54. Are any of its original authors still interested in completing it? - [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 08:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:53, 17 April 2012
Neglected article
This article has been allowed to remain in the present incomplete state for over four years. I suggest that in order to meet the minimum standard to be expected of a CZ article, it should provide such basic information as the aims, rules and activities of the organisation that it describes, and should back its statements with citations. I have not made any changes myself, except to change "sometimes known" to "formerly known" in the lede (it is true that some people incorrectly call the Commonwealth the "British Commonwealth", but to say so without qualification is to imply that it is correct to do so) and to change the membership from 53 to 54. Are any of its original authors still interested in completing it? - Nick Gardner 08:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC)