Talk:Commonwealth of Nations: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner (→Neglected article: new section) |
imported>Nick Gardner |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This article has been allowed to remain in the present incomplete state for over four years. I suggest that in order to meet the minimum standard to be expected of a CZ article, it should provide such basic information as the aims, rules and activities of the organisation that it describes, and should back its statements with citations. I have not made any changes myself, except to change "sometimes known" to "formerly known" in the lede (it is true that some people incorrectly call the Commonwealth the "British Commonwealth", but to say so without qualification is to imply that it is correct to do so) and to change the membership from 53 to 54. Are any of its original authors still interested in completing it? - [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 08:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | This article has been allowed to remain in the present incomplete state for over four years. I suggest that in order to meet the minimum standard to be expected of a CZ article, it should provide such basic information as the aims, rules and activities of the organisation that it describes, and should back its statements with citations. I have not made any changes myself, except to change "sometimes known" to "formerly known" in the lede (it is true that some people incorrectly call the Commonwealth the "British Commonwealth", but to say so without qualification is to imply that it is correct to do so) and to change the membership from 53 to 54. Are any of its original authors still interested in completing it? - [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 08:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
In the absence any expression of interest in response to the above, I propose to redraft this article, taking advantage of the plentiful published information on the subject. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 07:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:33, 4 May 2012
Neglected article
This article has been allowed to remain in the present incomplete state for over four years. I suggest that in order to meet the minimum standard to be expected of a CZ article, it should provide such basic information as the aims, rules and activities of the organisation that it describes, and should back its statements with citations. I have not made any changes myself, except to change "sometimes known" to "formerly known" in the lede (it is true that some people incorrectly call the Commonwealth the "British Commonwealth", but to say so without qualification is to imply that it is correct to do so) and to change the membership from 53 to 54. Are any of its original authors still interested in completing it? - Nick Gardner 08:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
In the absence any expression of interest in response to the above, I propose to redraft this article, taking advantage of the plentiful published information on the subject. Nick Gardner 07:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)