Talk:Fundamental Theorem of Algebra: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
imported>Paul Wormer
(→‎W.l.o.g.: new section)
Line 4: Line 4:


This is some material that used to be in the [[complex number]] article, but I felt an entire article on the fundamental theorem of algebra would be the better place for it. However all I did was cut and paste from there to here, so this article doesn't have a good structure yet. Feel free to attack it! - [[User:Greg Martin|Greg Martin]] 18:54, 29 April 2007 (CDT); clarified by [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 02:35, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
This is some material that used to be in the [[complex number]] article, but I felt an entire article on the fundamental theorem of algebra would be the better place for it. However all I did was cut and paste from there to here, so this article doesn't have a good structure yet. Feel free to attack it! - [[User:Greg Martin|Greg Martin]] 18:54, 29 April 2007 (CDT); clarified by [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 02:35, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
== W.l.o.g. ==
What does this mean?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 21:12, 13 March 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:12, 13 March 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Any nonconstant polynomial whose coefficients are complex numbers has at least one complex number as a root. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

just started the article

This is some material that used to be in the complex number article, but I felt an entire article on the fundamental theorem of algebra would be the better place for it. However all I did was cut and paste from there to here, so this article doesn't have a good structure yet. Feel free to attack it! - Greg Martin 18:54, 29 April 2007 (CDT); clarified by Jitse Niesen 02:35, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

W.l.o.g.

What does this mean?--Paul Wormer 21:12, 13 March 2008 (CDT)