Talk:Church of Scientology/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
imported>Steven Ferry |
imported>Robert W King |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Gentlemen, I have today set aside to work intensively on this project, and have hit a snag—someone has edited what I did while I am working on it, and now I have to merge his/her comments, but can find no such option in any of the buttons. I am happy to work on the draft somewhere else than where it is going to be edited while I am working on it, but my understanding of working in "talk space" is that this is the talk space....where we discuss the article rather than create the article. So where do I go? Would it perhaps be easier to create the whole thing off line and then post for discussion? This is a huge subject, and I find that I am travelling around the world on business almost non-stop, so my time has been somewhat thin for this project. However, I am onto it again and would like to post the next section and receive comments, so I can fine-tune future efforts. I was not aware that someone had edited my earlier post, even though I had listed it to be watched...maybe I have not done it correctly...but I must say, whoever worked on it I thought did a very good job and I am very comfortable working with whomsoever it was. [[User:Steven Ferry|Steven Ferry]] 11:02, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | Gentlemen, I have today set aside to work intensively on this project, and have hit a snag—someone has edited what I did while I am working on it, and now I have to merge his/her comments, but can find no such option in any of the buttons. I am happy to work on the draft somewhere else than where it is going to be edited while I am working on it, but my understanding of working in "talk space" is that this is the talk space....where we discuss the article rather than create the article. So where do I go? Would it perhaps be easier to create the whole thing off line and then post for discussion? This is a huge subject, and I find that I am travelling around the world on business almost non-stop, so my time has been somewhat thin for this project. However, I am onto it again and would like to post the next section and receive comments, so I can fine-tune future efforts. I was not aware that someone had edited my earlier post, even though I had listed it to be watched...maybe I have not done it correctly...but I must say, whoever worked on it I thought did a very good job and I am very comfortable working with whomsoever it was. [[User:Steven Ferry|Steven Ferry]] 11:02, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:For contentious articles the Talk space is perfectly suitable.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:08, 30 September 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:08, 30 September 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Religion Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Larry Sanger 23:43, 22 May 2007 (CDT); David Martin 20:46, 15 May 2007 (CDT) —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 13:19, 24 August 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Church of Scientology
Church of Scientology — just placing this link here so others know it exists. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 13:26, 24 August 2007 (CDT)
Draft in talk
I recommend that the article be redrafted in the talk space before appearing on the main article space.--Robert W King 10:29, 30 September 2007 (CDT)
I would agree with that. That practice works well when we're dealing with topics that are prone to a lot of controversy. --Larry Sanger 10:49, 30 September 2007 (CDT)
Gentlemen, I have today set aside to work intensively on this project, and have hit a snag—someone has edited what I did while I am working on it, and now I have to merge his/her comments, but can find no such option in any of the buttons. I am happy to work on the draft somewhere else than where it is going to be edited while I am working on it, but my understanding of working in "talk space" is that this is the talk space....where we discuss the article rather than create the article. So where do I go? Would it perhaps be easier to create the whole thing off line and then post for discussion? This is a huge subject, and I find that I am travelling around the world on business almost non-stop, so my time has been somewhat thin for this project. However, I am onto it again and would like to post the next section and receive comments, so I can fine-tune future efforts. I was not aware that someone had edited my earlier post, even though I had listed it to be watched...maybe I have not done it correctly...but I must say, whoever worked on it I thought did a very good job and I am very comfortable working with whomsoever it was. Steven Ferry 11:02, 30 September 2007 (CDT)
- For contentious articles the Talk space is perfectly suitable.--Robert W King 11:08, 30 September 2007 (CDT)
- Religion Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Religion Advanced Articles
- Religion Nonstub Articles
- Religion Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Religion Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Religion Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Religion Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Religion External Articles
- Religion Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Religion Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup