Talk:West Nile virus: Difference between revisions
imported>David E. Volk (→Internationalization: need a reference first! etc.) |
imported>David E. Volk m (Talk:West Nile Virus moved to Talk:West Nile virus: capitalization, I thought we fixed this eariler) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
Article originally drafted by [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:26, 5 April 2007 (CDT) | Article originally drafted by [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:26, 5 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Capitalisation== | ==Capitalisation== | ||
Shouldn't this article be named "West Nile virus" with a small "v"? [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 13:01, 5 June 2007 (CDT) | Shouldn't this article be named "West Nile virus" with a small "v"? [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 13:01, 5 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
: I concur. Unless someone objects, I will do the move. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 00:26, 16 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
== Internationalization == | == Internationalization == | ||
We really ought to report global data, at least about the virus in other English-speaking countries than the U.S., although I am sure the interests of English-speaking readers extend to the whole world, when it comes to this virus. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:33, 9 October 2007 (CDT) | We really ought to report global data, at least about the virus in other English-speaking countries than the U.S., although I am sure the interests of English-speaking readers extend to the whole world, when it comes to this virus. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:33, 9 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
You are correct, I just don't know who to cite for a good number on this. I will to check around with my virus expert friends. | You are correct, I just don't know who to cite for a good number on this. I will to check around with my virus expert friends. | ||
BTW Larry, I was reading the discussion regarding latin names vs common names, and it led me to wonder if | BTW Larry, I was reading the discussion regarding latin names vs common names, and it led me to wonder if | ||
we need to define a set of rules for viruses regarding family, genus, sero-complexes, and the like. The branches of viral trees are still being debated too, i.e. is Yellow fever the oldest flavivirus or not. | we need to define a set of rules for viruses regarding family, genus, sero-complexes, and the like. The branches of viral trees are still being debated too, i.e. is Yellow fever the oldest flavivirus or not. [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 09:05, 9 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:06, 16 March 2008
Article originally drafted by David E. Volk. --Larry Sanger 14:26, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
Capitalisation
Shouldn't this article be named "West Nile virus" with a small "v"? Derek Harkness 13:01, 5 June 2007 (CDT)
- I concur. Unless someone objects, I will do the move. J. Noel Chiappa 00:26, 16 March 2008 (CDT)
Internationalization
We really ought to report global data, at least about the virus in other English-speaking countries than the U.S., although I am sure the interests of English-speaking readers extend to the whole world, when it comes to this virus. --Larry Sanger 08:33, 9 October 2007 (CDT)
You are correct, I just don't know who to cite for a good number on this. I will to check around with my virus expert friends.
BTW Larry, I was reading the discussion regarding latin names vs common names, and it led me to wonder if we need to define a set of rules for viruses regarding family, genus, sero-complexes, and the like. The branches of viral trees are still being debated too, i.e. is Yellow fever the oldest flavivirus or not. David E. Volk 09:05, 9 October 2007 (CDT)