Talk:South Carolina, History: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen (avoid old fashioned terms, and avoid splitting SC articles) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
This article should be moved to [[History of South Carolina]] [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 22:27, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | This article should be moved to [[History of South Carolina]] [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 22:27, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:No please, let's keep it here. There is no advantage in separating it from the future SC articles. Historians and publishers avoid the term, "History of XYZ" as old fashioned. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 23:29, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | :No please, let's keep it here. There is no advantage in separating it from the future SC articles. Historians and publishers avoid the term, "History of XYZ" as old fashioned. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 23:29, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:23, 14 November 2007
This article should be moved to History of South Carolina Russell Potter 22:27, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
- No please, let's keep it here. There is no advantage in separating it from the future SC articles. Historians and publishers avoid the term, "History of XYZ" as old fashioned. Richard Jensen 23:29, 24 April 2007 (CDT)