Commercial state: Difference between revisions
imported>Roger A. Lohmann (Create commercial state entry) |
imported>Roger A. Lohmann (Add two paragraphs -( I can't figure out the /ref internal link syntax).) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Practical commercial state activities include governmental [[economic development]] efforts including encouraging plant relocations, tax rebates, zoning easements and assorted other incentives and concessions. | Practical commercial state activities include governmental [[economic development]] efforts including encouraging plant relocations, tax rebates, zoning easements and assorted other incentives and concessions. | ||
Numerous concepts in political science, such as [[John Fenton]]'s (1966) distinction between policy-oriented states ( Minnesota, Wisconsin and North Dakota) and job-oriented states (Michigan, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio) reflect differences in the role of commercial interests in U.S. state governments (although one could argue that the differences Fenton saw may have been considerably mitigated - generally in the direction of the commercial state - in these midwestern states over the past 40 years.) | |||
==References== | |||
Fenton, John H. 1966. Midwest politics. New York,: Holt Rinehart and Winston. | |||
Revision as of 08:06, 20 July 2007
The commercial state concept is sometimes associated with Adam Ferguson's concept of civil society and refers to a political state devoted primarily to the promotion and advancement of commercial interests.
Several lines of thought and action (e.g. Mercantilism ) run from ancient Greek and Roman philosophy through Ferguson and Adam Smith to the Federalist party of Alexander Hamilton and the Austrian economists such as Ludwig von Mises, Frederick Hayek down to modern theorists including Milton Friedman and Murray Rothbard.
Practical commercial state activities include governmental economic development efforts including encouraging plant relocations, tax rebates, zoning easements and assorted other incentives and concessions.
Numerous concepts in political science, such as John Fenton's (1966) distinction between policy-oriented states ( Minnesota, Wisconsin and North Dakota) and job-oriented states (Michigan, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio) reflect differences in the role of commercial interests in U.S. state governments (although one could argue that the differences Fenton saw may have been considerably mitigated - generally in the direction of the commercial state - in these midwestern states over the past 40 years.)
References
Fenton, John H. 1966. Midwest politics. New York,: Holt Rinehart and Winston.