Talk:Species (biology): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jasper Wubs
mNo edit summary
imported>Kim van der Linde
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = species
 
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check =
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Jasper Wubs|Jasper Wubs]] 10:19, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
}}


Just spotted the (nice!) graphic to the right. Shouldn't it be "the hierarchy of ''taxonomic'' classification" rather than ''scientific''? --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 15:24, 4 September 2007 (CDT)
Just spotted the (nice!) graphic to the right. Shouldn't it be "the hierarchy of ''taxonomic'' classification" rather than ''scientific''? --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 15:24, 4 September 2007 (CDT)


*Perhaps, taxonomy, however,  is a well founded science within biology, so I would feel that scientific is as correct as taxonomic. Its just a word that is a bit less specific, but I think that I do see your point (while writing this just now...) that the figure doesn't really display the entire collection of scientific classification systems that we know today, so I'll change it. Thanks! [[User:Jasper Wubs|Jasper Wubs]] 03:16, 5 September 2007 (CDT)
*Perhaps, taxonomy, however,  is a well founded science within biology, so I would feel that scientific is as correct as taxonomic. Its just a word that is a bit less specific, but I think that I do see your point (while writing this just now...) that the figure doesn't really display the entire collection of scientific classification systems that we know today, so I'll change it. Thanks! [[User:Jasper Wubs|Jasper Wubs]] 03:16, 5 September 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:10, 6 October 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A fundamental unit of biological classification - a set of individual organisms that produce fertile offspring. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Biology [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English


Just spotted the (nice!) graphic to the right. Shouldn't it be "the hierarchy of taxonomic classification" rather than scientific? --Nereo Preto 15:24, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

  • Perhaps, taxonomy, however, is a well founded science within biology, so I would feel that scientific is as correct as taxonomic. Its just a word that is a bit less specific, but I think that I do see your point (while writing this just now...) that the figure doesn't really display the entire collection of scientific classification systems that we know today, so I'll change it. Thanks! Jasper Wubs 03:16, 5 September 2007 (CDT)