Talk:Glacier: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Benjamin Seghers
(refs)
imported>Nereo Preto
Line 5: Line 5:
I added some external links from supposedly autoritative sites. We must add some lines of comments to explain what the links are for, sooner or later... --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 03:56, 6 October 2007 (CDT)
I added some external links from supposedly autoritative sites. We must add some lines of comments to explain what the links are for, sooner or later... --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 03:56, 6 October 2007 (CDT)
:Yeah, sounds good. Looks like you found quite a few good sites. Hopefully we can use some as references in the article. [[User:Benjamin Seghers|Benjamin Seghers]] 04:19, 6 October 2007 (CDT)
:Yeah, sounds good. Looks like you found quite a few good sites. Hopefully we can use some as references in the article. [[User:Benjamin Seghers|Benjamin Seghers]] 04:19, 6 October 2007 (CDT)
::The best ones are surely ok as references. USGS should be a guarantee of quality. --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 04:49, 6 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 04:49, 6 October 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Bodies of flowing ice that form when more snow accumulates each year than melts. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Geography and Earth Sciences [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

External links

I added some external links from supposedly autoritative sites. We must add some lines of comments to explain what the links are for, sooner or later... --Nereo Preto 03:56, 6 October 2007 (CDT)

Yeah, sounds good. Looks like you found quite a few good sites. Hopefully we can use some as references in the article. Benjamin Seghers 04:19, 6 October 2007 (CDT)
The best ones are surely ok as references. USGS should be a guarantee of quality. --Nereo Preto 04:49, 6 October 2007 (CDT)