Talk:Symphony/Catalogs/Symphonies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aleta Curry (whatever works out best!) |
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think the number of the symphony is a good way to list them. I suggest alphabetically by the nicknames, which are quite famous usually. --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 02:12, 21 October 2007 (CDT) | I don't think the number of the symphony is a good way to list them. I suggest alphabetically by the nicknames, which are quite famous usually. --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 02:12, 21 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Won't bother me. I tend to remember more numbers than names, I think, except for the really ''really'' famous names. The only think I can think wrong with your idea is that some don't have names. Some sites give more than one list, by composer, by number, by name--honestly I don't mind; whatever people think is best. [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 02:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT) | :Won't bother me. I tend to remember more numbers than names, I think, except for the really ''really'' famous names. The only think I can think wrong with your idea is that some don't have names. Some sites give more than one list, by composer, by number, by name--honestly I don't mind; whatever people think is best. [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 02:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Yes, the few without names will need numbers, but we could list them at the end. Alternatively, I suppose we could order them by composer, but I think it is more useful by nickname. Let's wait for someone else to comment, before doing anything :-) --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 02:24, 21 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:24, 21 October 2007
I don't think the number of the symphony is a good way to list them. I suggest alphabetically by the nicknames, which are quite famous usually. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 02:12, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
- Won't bother me. I tend to remember more numbers than names, I think, except for the really really famous names. The only think I can think wrong with your idea is that some don't have names. Some sites give more than one list, by composer, by number, by name--honestly I don't mind; whatever people think is best. Aleta Curry 02:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, the few without names will need numbers, but we could list them at the end. Alternatively, I suppose we could order them by composer, but I think it is more useful by nickname. Let's wait for someone else to comment, before doing anything :-) --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 02:24, 21 October 2007 (CDT)