CZ:Proposals/Constabulary: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
|Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 14:14, 13 February 2008 (CST)
|Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 14:14, 13 February 2008 (CST)
|Username of driver = [[User:Anthony Argyriou]]
|Username of driver = [[User:Anthony Argyriou]]
|Next step = Write new text for reversion policy
|Next step = Check over page and, if ready to go, submit to Constabulary
|Target date for next step = February 20
|Target date for next step = March 5
|Notes =  This stems from [[User talk:Larry Sanger#possible cause of slow growth|a discussion about the growth of Citizendium]].   
|Notes =  This stems from [[User talk:Larry Sanger#possible cause of slow growth|a discussion about the growth of Citizendium]].   
}}
}}


{{Proposals navigation}}
{{Proposals navigation}}

Revision as of 13:16, 27 February 2008

These are proposals that will go (or are now) before the Constabulary.

Change to reversion policy

Summary: CZ:Professionalism#Reversion and deletion as unprofessional behaviors says deletion of others' work without explanation is clearly unprofessional, and deletion of more than 50 words can result in a warning, followed by a ban., and similary discourages reverting of edits without explanation. The proposal is to rewrite the section to emphasize that it is the lack of explanation which is the offence, not the mere act of reverting or deleting others' work.
Original proposer: Anthony Argyriou 14:14, 13 February 2008 (CST) Next step: Check over page and, if ready to go, submit to Constabulary
Driver: User:Anthony Argyriou To be done by: March 5
Notes: This stems from a discussion about the growth of Citizendium.
Complete proposal


Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only)

Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):