CZ:Proposals/Citizendium Mobile: Difference between revisions
imported>Warren Schudy (discussion) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (comments) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
['''Note to the proposer:''' please delete these lines after reading! Please bear in mind that if you do not volunteer to be the driver of the proposal, and you do not fill it out in great detail, then your proposal or issue will be addressed ''only if'' a driver is found. So, if you really do want your work not to go to waste, please do help locate a driver for your proposal. Thanks! Now please delete the foregoing message!] | ['''Note to the proposer:''' please delete these lines after reading! Please bear in mind that if you do not volunteer to be the driver of the proposal, and you do not fill it out in great detail, then your proposal or issue will be addressed ''only if'' a driver is found. So, if you really do want your work not to go to waste, please do help locate a driver for your proposal. Thanks! Now please delete the foregoing message!] | ||
{{proposal assignment}} | {{proposal assignment|Dless}} | ||
'''Driver:''' | '''Driver:''' None | ||
== Complete explanation == | == Complete explanation == | ||
More than an year ago I saw how SharePoint sites automatically render in both desktop and mobile browsers. I thought we could do the same thing so I submitted a proposal. Now it looks like it has already been done - have a look at Wikizap Citizendium[http://wikizap.mobi/encitizendium/] | |||
--[[User:Graham Proud|Graham Proud]] 02:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
:It seems to ignore the subpages completely, thereby reducing usability. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 10:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Reasoning == | == Reasoning == | ||
Delivery in the mobile format will support an increasing rate of adoption. | |||
== Implementation == | == Implementation == | ||
Now we need to make this public! What is the next step for implementation? A submission to the Announcements email list? | |||
--[[User:Graham Proud|Graham Proud]] 02:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Perhaps you can start a forum thread on this? --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 10:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
= Discussion = | = Discussion = | ||
| Line 18: | Line 22: | ||
If someone with the technical expertise to implement this is interested, I'd say go for it. Otherwise, this seems too far down the priority list to worry about for another year or so. [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 12:51, 23 February 2008 (CST) | If someone with the technical expertise to implement this is interested, I'd say go for it. Otherwise, this seems too far down the priority list to worry about for another year or so. [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 12:51, 23 February 2008 (CST) | ||
:I'm thinking that if all of the technical resources and volunteers could be corralled into a single unified workgroup via my proposal, we could expedite something like this. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 15:02, 7 March 2008 (CST) | |||
{{Proposals navigation}} | |||
::I would like to see this eventually happen. This has already been done for WP (see http://pda.wapedia.mobi/en/) and maybe that developer (http://pda.wapedia.mobi/en/Wapedia_Wapedia) would do want to do the same for CZ. - [[User:Robert Badgett|Robert Badgett]] 09:47, 12 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:57, 2 November 2009
[Note to the proposer: please delete these lines after reading! Please bear in mind that if you do not volunteer to be the driver of the proposal, and you do not fill it out in great detail, then your proposal or issue will be addressed only if a driver is found. So, if you really do want your work not to go to waste, please do help locate a driver for your proposal. Thanks! Now please delete the foregoing message!]
This proposal is presently driverless. Why not become its driver?
You can sign up on its proposal record, which may be found on the driverless proposals page.
Driver: None
Complete explanation
More than an year ago I saw how SharePoint sites automatically render in both desktop and mobile browsers. I thought we could do the same thing so I submitted a proposal. Now it looks like it has already been done - have a look at Wikizap Citizendium[1] --Graham Proud 02:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- It seems to ignore the subpages completely, thereby reducing usability. --Daniel Mietchen 10:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Reasoning
Delivery in the mobile format will support an increasing rate of adoption.
Implementation
Now we need to make this public! What is the next step for implementation? A submission to the Announcements email list? --Graham Proud 02:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps you can start a forum thread on this? --Daniel Mietchen 10:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion
A discussion section, to which anyone may contribute.
If someone with the technical expertise to implement this is interested, I'd say go for it. Otherwise, this seems too far down the priority list to worry about for another year or so. Warren Schudy 12:51, 23 February 2008 (CST)
- I'm thinking that if all of the technical resources and volunteers could be corralled into a single unified workgroup via my proposal, we could expedite something like this. --Robert W King 15:02, 7 March 2008 (CST)
| Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only) | |
|
Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):
|
- I would like to see this eventually happen. This has already been done for WP (see http://pda.wapedia.mobi/en/) and maybe that developer (http://pda.wapedia.mobi/en/Wapedia_Wapedia) would do want to do the same for CZ. - Robert Badgett 09:47, 12 March 2008 (CDT)