Talk:Crusades: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
(→‎Map and article name: What I meant by "significant")
imported>Richard Jensen
(moving daze)
Line 13: Line 13:


:::: By "significant" I merely meant 'added significant content'. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 21:44, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
:::: By "significant" I merely meant 'added significant content'. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 21:44, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
::::well yes but I don't see any problem.  The full record is all online at this article and the older article. I used cut and past because you don't want to use "move" to replace an existing article.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 21:49, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 20:49, 11 March 2008

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Medieval wars of religion fought by Christians, the most famous being in the Holy Land. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories history, military and religion [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Map and article name

In case anyone is interested on a map about the early Crusades, here is one [1]. The work is on the Public Domain, because it's a work from the U.S Federal Government [2]. Also, shouldn't this article be Crusades instead of The Crusades?--José Leonardo Andrade 09:22, 19 October 2007 (CDT)

No repply so far. In any case, I will redirect Crusades to this page. Maybe an editor from the History Workgroup can voice his opinion on this issue one day.--José Leonardo Andrade 09:43, 16 November 2007 (CST)

agreed on name = Crusades and I will change it Richard Jensen 15:46, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
Alas, that move was (incorrectly) done via a cut-and-paste, not using the "move page" function. I've looked at the history (here), and IMO the history at the prior location is in fact significant. Can a constable please repair this? There's an instruction page here, and it's not too difficult. I'd do it myself (I used to be the 'fixing cut and paste moves' guru on Wikipedia), but alas I don't have sysop. J. Noel Chiappa 20:51, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
significant??? Denis and I did 100% of the writing. no secret about that. Richard Jensen 21:40, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
By "significant" I merely meant 'added significant content'. J. Noel Chiappa 21:44, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
well yes but I don't see any problem. The full record is all online at this article and the older article. I used cut and past because you don't want to use "move" to replace an existing article.Richard Jensen 21:49, 11 March 2008 (CDT)