CZ:Proposals/Unified Feature-Rich Workgroup page design template: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert W King |
imported>Jitse Niesen (to be decided by contributors to this page) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{proposal assignment}} | {{proposal assignment|Adhoc}} | ||
This proposal can be decided by all who choose to comment on this page, unless the Editorial Council decides that they want to have a vote on it. As usual, a 2/3 majority is required to approve the proposal. | |||
'''Driver:''' [[User:Robert_W_King|Robert King]] | '''Driver:''' [[User:Robert_W_King|Robert King]] |
Revision as of 06:55, 10 April 2008
This proposal has been assigned on an ad hoc basis to the person or persons named just below, and is now in the Ad hoc proposals queue
This proposal can be decided by all who choose to comment on this page, unless the Editorial Council decides that they want to have a vote on it. As usual, a 2/3 majority is required to approve the proposal.
Driver: Robert King
Complete explanation
Many workgroup pages are either extremely well developed, somewhat developed, or not developed at all. The situation could be broadly improved if a unified feature-rich design template were used on each Workgroup page.
The following outline probably indicates what is necessary to make this happen:
- Discussion and community agreement upon use
- Total community input on the value and components of such a system (appearance, looks, features, what is important and what's not)
- Polling to determine elements
This is only about appearance, and not necessarily about trackers, or data.
Most of this idea is inspired by David's work on the Chemistry style guide and the CZ:Howto page.
Reasoning
There are several justifications for this. One is to increase the visibility of each workgroup page collectively, and to enhance their functionality. This would be a benefit to all workgroups across the board.
Two, a better appearance and streamlined homepage might enable more participation within workgroups.
Implementation
Actual implementation would be pretty easy from a cosmetic perspective.
Discussion
Please discuss here!
At some point, we need to have a "perfect" article example for each workgroup for new users to compare with to go with the style guide and template approaches. I am not quite sure exaclty what your proposal means Robert, could you expound on it a little more? For example in chemistry, would the template automatically put in a blank chem_infobox or elem_infobox, or a check to decide which is needed? Are you talking color schemes within a group?
Could you look at Phosphorus and Ketoconazole and then describe what this template would do? David E. Volk 13:58, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- This is just on the workgroup pages themselves, not in workgroup articles. --Robert W King 14:21, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only) | |
|
Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):
|