Talk:Pseudomonas putida: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John J. Dennehy
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Tom Kelly
(→‎recommendation: new section)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== recommendation ==
Hello,
I'm not an expert in English or in Microbiology, but I would recommend strengthening the sentence begining with: "Being a non-pathogenic bacteria," ...
Here is what I think.  The subsection is called "pathology."  Since you say it is non-pathogenic, you should say that in the first sentence, then go on to say how it is similar to P. aeriginosa (sp?).  Or, say both in the first sentence - ... ex "P. putida is considered nonpathogenic, but is similar in genome to p. aeriginosa and a handful of infections have been reported..."
Cheers,
[[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 11:52, 18 April 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 10:52, 18 April 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Gram-negative,rod-shaped, saprotrophic soil bacterium which demonstrates a very diverse metabolism, including the ability to degrade organic solvents such as toluene, and is used in bioremediation. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Biology and Eduzendium [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

recommendation

Hello, I'm not an expert in English or in Microbiology, but I would recommend strengthening the sentence begining with: "Being a non-pathogenic bacteria," ...

Here is what I think. The subsection is called "pathology." Since you say it is non-pathogenic, you should say that in the first sentence, then go on to say how it is similar to P. aeriginosa (sp?). Or, say both in the first sentence - ... ex "P. putida is considered nonpathogenic, but is similar in genome to p. aeriginosa and a handful of infections have been reported..."

Cheers, Tom Kelly 11:52, 18 April 2008 (CDT)