CZ:Biology Workgroup/Biology Week/Pending decisions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen (intro rephrased; +bot assistance) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (just saw that there are two related proposals on a citation scheme...) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
#[[CZ:Disambiguation|Disambiguation policy]] | #[[CZ:Disambiguation|Disambiguation policy]] | ||
#[[CZ Talk:Original Research Policy|Original Research Policy]] | #[[CZ Talk:Original Research Policy|Original Research Policy]] | ||
#[[CZ:Proposals/ | #Citability of contributions to CZ as per [[CZ:Proposals/Citing CZ article by authors]] and [[CZ:Proposals/Pilot to allow Citizens to take credit for pages]] | ||
#Policy on frequency and order of [[CZ:Workgroup Weeks]] | #Policy on frequency and order of [[CZ:Workgroup Weeks]] | ||
#[[CZ:Proposals/Create a page for all notable genes in the human genome|Bot assistance for fact-picking]] | #[[CZ:Proposals/Create a page for all notable genes in the human genome|Bot assistance for fact-picking]] | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 1 July 2008
There are a few pending decisions whose outcome will influence how the first CZ:Biology Week will be or can be announced.
These include:
- CZ-wise
- Core Article structure
- Disambiguation policy
- Original Research Policy
- Citability of contributions to CZ as per CZ:Proposals/Citing CZ article by authors and CZ:Proposals/Pilot to allow Citizens to take credit for pages
- Policy on frequency and order of CZ:Workgroup Weeks
- Bot assistance for fact-picking
- Biology-wise
- Biology Core Articles
- Species naming convention
- How to structure the Community page article in PLoS Biology - depends on the other decisions
- On both ends:
- Policy on how to integrate newly recruited contributors (see CZ:Recruitment and its talk page)
- Policy on how to stimulate collaborative writing on individual articles