Gabapentin: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
No edit summary
imported>Robert Badgett
Line 3: Line 3:


==Effectiveness==
==Effectiveness==
Regarding the treatment of [[diabetic neuropathy]] or [[postherpetic neuralgia]], [[randomized controlled trial]] found that while gabapentin was not as effective as morphine, the combination of the two medications was more effective than either alone and allowed for a lower dose of morphine.<ref name="pmid15800228">{{cite journal |author=Gilron I, Bailey JM, Tu D, Holden RR, Weaver DF, Houlden RL |title=Morphine, gabapentin, or their combination for neuropathic pain |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=352 |issue=13 |pages=1324–34 |year=2005 |month=March |pmid=15800228 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa042580 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=15800228&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref>
Regarding the treatment of [[diabetic neuropathy]] or [[postherpetic neuralgia]], a [[randomized controlled trial]] found that while gabapentin was not as effective as morphine, the combination of the two medications was more effective than either alone and allowed for a lower dose of morphine.<ref name="pmid15800228">{{cite journal |author=Gilron I, Bailey JM, Tu D, Holden RR, Weaver DF, Houlden RL |title=Morphine, gabapentin, or their combination for neuropathic pain |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=352 |issue=13 |pages=1324–34 |year=2005 |month=March |pmid=15800228 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa042580 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=15800228&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref>
 
Regarding the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in persons with spinal cord injury, a [[randomized controlled trial]] found that [[amitriptyline]] was more effective than active placebo and possibly better than gabapentin among patients with symptoms of [[depression]] while neither gabapentin nor [[amitriptyline]] helped patients without depression although there was a statistically insignificant trend favoring [[amitriptyline]].<ref name="pmid18047869">{{cite journal |author=Rintala DH, Holmes SA, Courtade D, Fiess RN, Tastard LV, Loubser PG |title=Comparison of the effectiveness of amitriptyline and gabapentin on chronic neuropathic pain in persons with spinal cord injury |journal=Arch Phys Med Rehabil |volume=88 |issue=12 |pages=1547–60 |year=2007 |month=December |pmid=18047869 |doi=10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.038 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003-9993(07)01541-9 |issn=}}</ref>


Regarding the treatment of [[low back pain]], a [[systematic review]] found that gabapentin may be effective.<ref name="pmid17909211">{{cite journal |author=Chou R, Huffman LH |title=Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=147 |issue=7 |pages=505–14 |year=2007 |month=October |pmid=17909211 |doi= |url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=reprint&pmid=17909211 |issn=}}</ref>
Regarding the treatment of [[low back pain]], a [[systematic review]] found that gabapentin may be effective.<ref name="pmid17909211">{{cite journal |author=Chou R, Huffman LH |title=Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=147 |issue=7 |pages=505–14 |year=2007 |month=October |pmid=17909211 |doi= |url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=reprint&pmid=17909211 |issn=}}</ref>


For partial [[epilepsy]], the SANAD [[randomized controlled trial]] compared [[carbamazepine]], [[gabapentin]], [[lamotrigine]], [[oxcarbazepine]], or [[topiramate]] and concluded that gabapentin was less effective.<ref name="pmid17382827">{{cite journal |author=Marson AG, Al-Kharusi AM, Alwaidh M, ''et al'' |title=The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial |journal=Lancet |volume=369 |issue=9566 |pages=1000–15 |year=2007 |month=March |pmid=17382827 |pmc=2080688 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60460-7 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(07)60460-7 |issn=}}</ref>
For partial [[epilepsy]], the SANAD [[randomized controlled trial]] compared [[carbamazepine]], gabapentin, [[lamotrigine]], [[oxcarbazepine]], or [[topiramate]] and concluded that gabapentin was less effective.<ref name="pmid17382827">{{cite journal |author=Marson AG, Al-Kharusi AM, Alwaidh M, ''et al'' |title=The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial |journal=Lancet |volume=369 |issue=9566 |pages=1000–15 |year=2007 |month=March |pmid=17382827 |pmc=2080688 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60460-7 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(07)60460-7 |issn=}}</ref>


==Legal action==
==Legal action==

Revision as of 21:28, 21 June 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Gabapentin is a medication used for epilepsy and postherpetic neuralgia.

Effectiveness

Regarding the treatment of diabetic neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia, a randomized controlled trial found that while gabapentin was not as effective as morphine, the combination of the two medications was more effective than either alone and allowed for a lower dose of morphine.[1]

Regarding the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in persons with spinal cord injury, a randomized controlled trial found that amitriptyline was more effective than active placebo and possibly better than gabapentin among patients with symptoms of depression while neither gabapentin nor amitriptyline helped patients without depression although there was a statistically insignificant trend favoring amitriptyline.[2]

Regarding the treatment of low back pain, a systematic review found that gabapentin may be effective.[3]

For partial epilepsy, the SANAD randomized controlled trial compared carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate and concluded that gabapentin was less effective.[4]

Legal action

In the case of United States ex. rel David Franklin vs. Pfizer, Inc., and Parke-Davis, Division of Warner-Lambert Company, "in 2004 the Pfizer subsidiary Warner-Lambert settled litigation and admitted guilt in connection to charges that during the 1990s it violated federal regulations by promoting the drug for pain, psychiatric conditions, migraine, and other unapproved uses."[5]

References