CZ:Ref:DOI:10.1080/08989620802689821: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Caesar Schinas (subst template which is only used here) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (typo) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| last2 = Poulin | first2 = B.J. | | last2 = Poulin | first2 = B.J. | ||
}} | }} | ||
:Suggests, based on a study of the costs of [[peer review]] at the [http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/index_eng.asp Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada], that innovation could be stimulated by avoiding peer review for grants at the initial | :Suggests, based on a study of the costs of [[peer review]] at the [http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/index_eng.asp Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada], that innovation could be stimulated by avoiding peer review for grants at the initial stages of research. | ||
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; padding: 0px;" | {| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; padding: 0px;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Latest revision as of 20:27, 7 August 2010
Gordon, R. & B.J. Poulin (2009), "Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System Exceeds the Cost of Giving Every Qualified Researcher a Baseline Grant", Accountability in Research 16 (1): 13–40, DOI:10.1080/08989620802689821 [e]
- Suggests, based on a study of the costs of peer review at the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, that innovation could be stimulated by avoiding peer review for grants at the initial stages of research.