Talk:Associated Legendre function/Addendum: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dan Nessett
(First entry on Addendum page is proof)
 
imported>Paul Wormer
(→‎Comments on proof: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
I added a proof of orthogonality and a derivation of the normalization constant for the first equation in the [[Associated_Legendre_function#Orthogonality relations | Orthogonality relations section]] in on the main page. [[User:Dan Nessett|Dan Nessett]] 16:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
I added a proof of orthogonality and a derivation of the normalization constant for the first equation in the [[Associated_Legendre_function#Orthogonality relations | Orthogonality relations section]] in on the main page. [[User:Dan Nessett|Dan Nessett]] 16:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
== Comments on proof ==
1. The proof starts out by implicitly proving the anti-Hermiticity of
:<math>
\nabla_x \equiv \frac{d}{dx}.
</math>
Indeed, let ''w(x)'' be a function with ''w''(1) = ''w''(&minus;1) = 0, then
:<math>
\langle w g | \nabla_x f\rangle = \int_{-1}^1 w(x)g(x)\nabla_x f(x) dx 
= \left[ w(x)g(x)f(x) \right]_{-1}^{1}  - \int_{-1}^1 \Big(\nabla_x w(x)g(x)\Big)  f(x) dx
= - \langle \nabla_x (w g) |  f\rangle
</math>
Hence
:<math>
\nabla_x^\dagger = - \nabla_x \;\Longrightarrow\; \left(\nabla_x^\dagger\right)^{l+m}  = (-1)^{l+m} \nabla_x^{l+m}
</math>
The latter result is used in the proof given in the Addendum.
2. When as an intermediate the ordinary Legendre polynomials ''P''<sub>''l''</sub> are introduced,  we may use a result from the theory of orthogonal polynomials. Namely, a Legendre polynomial of order ''l'' is orthogonal to any polynomial of lower order. We meet  (''k'' &le; ''l'')
:<math>
\langle w \nabla_x^m P_k | \nabla_x^m P_l\rangle\quad\hbox{with}\quad w\equiv (1-x^2)^m,
</math>
then
:<math>
\langle w \nabla_x^m P_k | \nabla_x^m P_l\rangle =
(-1)^m \langle \nabla_x^m  (w \nabla_x^m P_k) |  P_l\rangle
</math>
The bra is a polynomial of order ''k'', and since ''k'' &le; ''l'',  the bracket is non-zero only if ''k'' = ''l''.
Then, knowing this, the hard work (given in the Addendum) of computing the normalization constant remains.

Revision as of 10:13, 12 July 2009

I added a proof of orthogonality and a derivation of the normalization constant for the first equation in the Orthogonality relations section in on the main page. Dan Nessett 16:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments on proof

1. The proof starts out by implicitly proving the anti-Hermiticity of

Indeed, let w(x) be a function with w(1) = w(−1) = 0, then

Hence

The latter result is used in the proof given in the Addendum.

2. When as an intermediate the ordinary Legendre polynomials Pl are introduced, we may use a result from the theory of orthogonal polynomials. Namely, a Legendre polynomial of order l is orthogonal to any polynomial of lower order. We meet (kl)

then

The bra is a polynomial of order k, and since kl, the bracket is non-zero only if k = l.

Then, knowing this, the hard work (given in the Addendum) of computing the normalization constant remains.