User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows/Research cycle: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(+one)
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(calendar)
Line 2: Line 2:


*[http://wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_rich_text_editor_tutorials/What_is_a_wiki#Interesting_uses_of_Wiki_technology General use cases of wiki technology]
*[http://wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_rich_text_editor_tutorials/What_is_a_wiki#Interesting_uses_of_Wiki_technology General use cases of wiki technology]
:e.g. [http://www.koltzenburg.net/aiki/CalenDar Calendar]
*[[Scientific_method#Components_of_the_scientific_method|Integral part of the scientific method]]
*[[Scientific_method#Components_of_the_scientific_method|Integral part of the scientific method]]
*For technical reasons, [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/LSWT 2010/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows/Publishing|publishing]] was historically a separate step, performed about once per cycle.
*For technical reasons, [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/LSWT 2010/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows/Publishing|publishing]] was historically a separate step, performed about once per cycle.

Revision as of 08:12, 22 July 2010

CC Image
The research cycle if it were public by default.
e.g. Calendar
  • Integral part of the scientific method
  • For technical reasons, publishing was historically a separate step, performed about once per cycle.
  • Publishing every relevant bit of information immediately at each step is technically feasible now, but are we culturally ready for that?
    • Some of us are — pioneering example: UsefulChem.
    • And others?
Take a look at Recent Changes at OpenWetWare — dozens of labs, hundreds of researchers; covers all steps of the research cycle, except for funding and (formal) publishing