Template:CharterVote2/36/Discussion: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones
(Clarifying)
imported>Joe Quick
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>[[User:D. Matt Innis/CurrentDraft/RevisedStructure|< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE]]<br /></noinclude>
<noinclude>[[User:D. Matt Innis/CurrentDraft/RevisedStructure|< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE]]<br /></noinclude>


I agree with Martin on this one, and suggest to delete 37, while rephrasing 36 in the following way:
I agree with Martin's comment on art. 37, and suggest to delete 37, while rephrasing 36 in the following way:


<blockquote>Appeals of formal decisions shall be possible when a disputant can show an Appeals Board that either:
<blockquote>Appeals of formal decisions shall be possible when a disputant can show an Appeals Board that either:
Line 10: Line 10:
Or are you proposing to delete 37?  I Agree with the text, in either case.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 23:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Or are you proposing to delete 37?  I Agree with the text, in either case.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 23:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
:It doesn't matter which of the two is deleted after the merger, but we have to pick one, and I suggest 37. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 00:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
:It doesn't matter which of the two is deleted after the merger, but we have to pick one, and I suggest 37. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 00:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
:Agree to keep Daniel's version above while deleting 37. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 01:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
:Agree to Daniel's version and delete 37. [[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 04:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:20, 19 July 2010

< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE

I agree with Martin's comment on art. 37, and suggest to delete 37, while rephrasing 36 in the following way:

Appeals of formal decisions shall be possible when a disputant can show an Appeals Board that either:

  1. New information is available; or
  2. A technical error was made during the previous formal procedure.

--Daniel Mietchen 22:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Or are you proposing to delete 37? I Agree with the text, in either case. Russell D. Jones 23:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

It doesn't matter which of the two is deleted after the merger, but we have to pick one, and I suggest 37. --Daniel Mietchen 00:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Agree to keep Daniel's version above while deleting 37. D. Matt Innis 01:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Agree to Daniel's version and delete 37. Joe Quick 04:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC)