Talk:Collectivist anarchism: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mirzhan Irkegulov
(Talk page generated using Special:MetadataForm)
 
imported>Mirzhan Irkegulov
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Good start ==
A common impression of anarchism is of chaos. Your first sentence should make it clear that this idea has some ordering economic structure. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
:Hm, you are right. However, i thought that everything considering anarchism itself (including its common impressions) should be in [[anarchism]], while this articles should be very-very specific. Am i not right? --[[User:Mirzhan Irkegulov|Mirzhan Irkegulov]] 19:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
::The introduction should set context, which does mean at least a sentence of two on how this differs from common impressions. You can't assume that a user first reads [[anarchy]], when a search engine might be bringing the user directly to this article. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 19:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
:::Better now, i hope? Thank you for the advice. --[[User:Mirzhan Irkegulov|Mirzhan Irkegulov]] 19:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:50, 20 September 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Collectivist anarchism is a political theory that advocates creation of society without any authority, where means of production are owned collectively [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Politics and Sociology [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup category:  Anarchism
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Good start

A common impression of anarchism is of chaos. Your first sentence should make it clear that this idea has some ordering economic structure. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Hm, you are right. However, i thought that everything considering anarchism itself (including its common impressions) should be in anarchism, while this articles should be very-very specific. Am i not right? --Mirzhan Irkegulov 19:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
The introduction should set context, which does mean at least a sentence of two on how this differs from common impressions. You can't assume that a user first reads anarchy, when a search engine might be bringing the user directly to this article. Howard C. Berkowitz 19:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Better now, i hope? Thank you for the advice. --Mirzhan Irkegulov 19:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)