User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows/Research cycle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen (indentation) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (formatting) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
**Some of us are — pioneering example: [http://usefulchem.wikispaces.com/ UsefulChem]. | **Some of us are — pioneering example: [http://usefulchem.wikispaces.com/ UsefulChem]. | ||
**And others? | **And others? | ||
::Take a look at [http://openwetware.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges Recent Changes] at [http://openwetware.org/ OpenWetWare] | ::Take a look at [http://openwetware.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges Recent Changes] at [http://openwetware.org/ OpenWetWare] — covers all steps of the research cycle, except for [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/LSWT 2010/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows/Funding|funding]] and (formal) [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/LSWT 2010/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows/Publishing|publishing]] | ||
Revision as of 18:43, 5 May 2010
- Integral part of the scientific method
- For technical reasons, publishing was historically a separate step, performed about once per cycle.
- Publishing every relevant bit of information immediately at each step is technically feasible now, but are we culturally ready for that?
- Some of us are — pioneering example: UsefulChem.
- And others?
- Take a look at Recent Changes at OpenWetWare — covers all steps of the research cycle, except for funding and (formal) publishing