User talk:Roger A. Lohmann/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick (→follow-up to our conversation about culture area: new section) |
imported>Joe Quick (→final version for approval on folk saint: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
It occurred to me just now that you might be interested in developing an inter-disciplinary approach to the article on [[ethnonym]]s as well. It was one of the first articles I worked on here, and I've hardly looked back since, but it would be a good candidate for attention from many different perspectives. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 15:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | It occurred to me just now that you might be interested in developing an inter-disciplinary approach to the article on [[ethnonym]]s as well. It was one of the first articles I worked on here, and I've hardly looked back since, but it would be a good candidate for attention from many different perspectives. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 15:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
== final version for approval on [[folk saint]] == | |||
If you have a moment, please have a look at the most recent posts [[Talk:Folk_saint#Toward_Approval|here]]. In order to include Shamira's copyedits in the approved article, the to-be-approved version number has to be updated in the metadata by the nominating editor. Thanks! --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 15:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:03, 28 June 2009
User bio is in User:Roger_Lohmann
follow-up to our conversation about culture area
It occurred to me just now that you might be interested in developing an inter-disciplinary approach to the article on ethnonyms as well. It was one of the first articles I worked on here, and I've hardly looked back since, but it would be a good candidate for attention from many different perspectives. --Joe Quick 15:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
final version for approval on folk saint
If you have a moment, please have a look at the most recent posts here. In order to include Shamira's copyedits in the approved article, the to-be-approved version number has to be updated in the metadata by the nominating editor. Thanks! --Joe Quick 15:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)