User talk:D. Matt Innis: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
(→‎Led Zeppelin: response to Meg)
imported>Daniel Mietchen
Line 25: Line 25:


:I realized you were right. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 12:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
:I realized you were right. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 12:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
== Appeal of block 1549 ==
Hi Matt,
please take a look at [[CZ:Managing Editor/2010/3 - Appeal of block 1549]] and comment in the [[CZ:Managing Editor/2010/3 - Appeal of block 1549#Statement_by_the_Chief_Constable|Statement by the Chief Constable]] section as you see fit. Thank you!
--[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 21:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:22, 24 November 2010

Citizendium Moderator Group
Professionalism | Moderator Blocking Procedures | Article Deletion Policy
Application Review Procedure | Moderator Policy | Help for Moderators
How to Edit
Getting Started Organization Technical Help
Policies Content Policy
Welcome Page


To Approve articles Confirm Accounts Diberri citation maker Help Wikiformatting Citizendium Test Wiki CZ:How to use Bugzilla

Hourglass drawing.svg Where Matt lives it is approximately: 12:15





Cleaned up and ready for more

Oxytocin ready for approval

Matt, I updated the version number of Oxytocin after vetting Gareth's last minute edits. I believe you can approve it now. Thanks. —Anthony.Sebastian 21:32, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Will do, Anthony. I'll wait till I get home from work when I can stay focused. D. Matt Innis 21:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Led Zeppelin

I want to know Matt why you have decided to correct Jimmy Page's birthdate in the Led Zeppelin, after refusing my request to do so a number of months ago citing "Only a music editor can correct it". This was over a series of emails I sent to you earlier this year. Meg Ireland 11:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

I realized you were right. D. Matt Innis 12:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Appeal of block 1549

Hi Matt,

please take a look at CZ:Managing Editor/2010/3 - Appeal of block 1549 and comment in the Statement by the Chief Constable section as you see fit. Thank you!

--Daniel Mietchen 21:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)