User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Wikis as platforms for OA publishing: Difference between revisions
< User:Daniel Mietchen | Talks | COASP 2010
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen (section headings) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Wikis as platforms for OA publishing == | == Wikis as platforms for OA publishing == | ||
*Open Access by [http://eoearth.org/article/EoE_FAQs#Can_I_use_material_published_in_the_EoE.3F default] (non-open licenses are [http://www.scholarpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special:Copyright&id=1 possible]) | |||
**Fine-grained configurability of [[User:Chris Key/Sandbox/Proposal: Overhaul of user rights#Summary of Rights Given to Each User Group|user rights]], thereby allowing for any peer review model (and any business model). | |||
*[http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikis_in_scholarly_communication#Comparison_between_paper-based_and_wiki-based_scholarly_communication_systems In comparison to paper-based scholarly communication]: | |||
**Web-native: Basically anything on the web can be [http://test.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Widget_tests#Widget:SlideShare embedded] or otherwise directly linked to | |||
**[[Biology/Related Articles|Contextual links]] are the central pillar | |||
**[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/COASP_2010/Overview&action=history Version control] built in (along with time stamps, naturally), thus allowing [[NMR_spectroscopy|stable releases]] ''and'' [[NMR_spectroscopy/Draft|updatability]], while establishing priority | |||
*Several [http://www.wikimatrix.org/compare/3F-Wiki%2B%40Wiki%2BAnwiki%2Bbitweaver%2BbLADE-Wiki%2BBoltWire%2BBrainKeeper%2BBusinessWiki%2BButorWiki%2BCanvasWiki%2BCentralDesktop%2BClearspace%2BClearWiki%2BcodeBeamer%2BConfluence%2BConnectedText%2BCorendal-Wiki%2BCospire%2BDaisy%2BDokuWiki%2BDrupal-Wiki%2BEditMe%2BErfurtWiki%2BFlexWiki%2BFoswiki%2BFriki%2BGazest%2BGeboGebo%2BGeniusWiki%2BGiki%2BGit-Wiki%2Bgitit%2BGroupswiki%2BHatta%2BIkeWiki%2Bikiwiki%2BIncentive%2BInstiki%2BIntodit%2BJacwiki%2BJAMWiki%2BJaWiki%2BJSPWiki%2BKeheiWiki%2BLionWiki%2BLuminotes%2BLunaWiki%2BMediaWiki%2BMetadot-Wiki%2BMidgard-Wiki%2BMindTouch%2BminiWiki%2BMoinMoin%2BMojoMojo%2BMoniWiki%2BNetcipia%2Bnexdo%2BOddmuse%2BOpenWikiNG%2BPageWork%2BPAUX%2BPBwiki%2BPhpWiki%2BPimki%2BPmWiki%2BPodWiki%2BProjectForum%2BProntoWiki%2BProWiki%2BPukiWiki%2BRiki%2BSamePage%2BScrewTurn-Wiki%2BSharePoint-Wiki-Plus%2BSocialtext%2BSpringnote%2BSputnik%2BSubWiki%2BSwirrl%2BSycamore%2Btelepark.wiki%2BThoughtFarmer%2BTiddlyWiki%2BTiki-Wiki-CMS-Groupware%2BTraction-TeamPage%2BTracWiki%2BTriki-Wiki%2BTWiki%2BUniWakka%2BUseMod%2BVQWiki%2BWackoWiki%2BWagn%2BWala-Wiki%2BWetpaint%2BWicked%2BWiclear%2BWiGit%2BWiki-Spot%2BWiki-Toolkit%2BWikia%2BWikiASP%2BWikiCrowd%2BWikiDoc%2BWikidot%2BWikiNi%2BWikiSH%2BWikispaces%2BWikkaWiki%2BWikyBlog%2BwxWikiServer%2BXoWiki%2BXWiki%2Byawiki%2BZoho-Wiki%2BZwiki popular wikis] are open source and have been tested under high load | |||
*The more open research becomes, the [http://ways.org/files/Open_Science_Adapting_the_research_cycle_animated-small.gif more diverse] will the acts of science publishing become. Wikis exist for [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/LSWT 2010/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows|all aspects of the research cycle]] (except for funding decisions, for cultural reasons) | |||
Revision as of 22:51, 19 August 2010
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
Wikis as platforms for Open Access publishing · Prototypes · Editorial policies · Guided tour ·
Obstacles · Alternatives · Outlook · Summary · Slides · Video · Q & A · Demo
Science is already a wiki if you look at it a certain way. It’s just a highly inefficient one — the incremental edits are made in papers instead of wikispace, and significant effort is expended to recapitulate existing knowledge in a paper in order to support the one to three new assertions made in any one paper. — John Wilbanks. Illustration: papers and wikispace.
Wikis as platforms for science communication in general
- Wikis can be used, in principle, for any aspect of scholarly communication, as detailed in this comparison of wiki- and paper-based communication systems and the related blog post.
- Examples exist for all steps of the research cycle, except successful applications to major funders (see this overview for some attempts)
- Benchmark: English Wikipedia
Wikis as platforms for OA publishing
- Open Access by default (non-open licenses are possible)
- Fine-grained configurability of user rights, thereby allowing for any peer review model (and any business model).
- In comparison to paper-based scholarly communication:
- Web-native: Basically anything on the web can be embedded or otherwise directly linked to
- Contextual links are the central pillar
- Version control built in (along with time stamps, naturally), thus allowing stable releases and updatability, while establishing priority
- Several popular wikis are open source and have been tested under high load
- The more open research becomes, the more diverse will the acts of science publishing become. Wikis exist for all aspects of the research cycle (except for funding decisions, for cultural reasons)
