User talk:Henry A. Padleckas: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Henry A. Padleckas
(→‎About your boiling point diagram: final diagram inserted; approving reviewer notified)
imported>Milton Beychok
Line 18: Line 18:


:I just inserted the diagram and left a message on [[User talk:Anthony.Sebastian]] and on [[Talk:Boiling point/Draft]] that Milton Beychok approves.  [[User:Henry A. Padleckas|Henry A. Padleckas]] 09:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
:I just inserted the diagram and left a message on [[User talk:Anthony.Sebastian]] and on [[Talk:Boiling point/Draft]] that Milton Beychok approves.  [[User:Henry A. Padleckas|Henry A. Padleckas]] 09:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
== About [[Missile vehicle]] ==
Hi, Henry: After a quick scan of the subject article, I did the following:
* I created the credit line for the photo which the original uploader failed to do.
* I removed the "Technical Team" category from the Metadata form because we have no such workgroup for articles.
* I down-graded the status from 1 (Developed and ready for Approval) to 2 (Developing). Before upgrading to a status of 1, I suggest that:
**The article be reformatted by creating some relevant sections, for example, a fairly brief introductory section and a "History" section with a section header. Perhaps you could break it down into even more sections.
**Create and populate the "Related articles" subpage (equivalent to WP's "See also" section)
**Create and populate the "External links" subpage (hyperlinks to other website information ... but not WP.)
**Create and, if you can, populate the "Bibliography" subpage (more books and journal articles that are relevant).
* Let it sit for a while (perhaps at least a 2-3 weeks) to see if anyone else edits/add/deletes, revises the article.
Best regards, [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 21:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:13, 9 March 2012

Previous User pages archived: User talk:Henry A. Padleckas/Archive 1

Glad to see that you are back!!

Hi, Henry: Glad to see you back with us ... and I hope that you stay.

Best regards, Milton Beychok 02:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

About Boiling point/Draft

Hi, Henry:

I have responded to your comment on my Talk page about Boiling point/Draft. I think that it may be best if you copied your comment and my response ... and pasted it into the talk page of Boiling point/Draft in the section devoted to comments about the re-approval. That is the more appropriate place for our interchange of comments. Regards, Milton Beychok 17:40, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

About your boiling point diagram

Henry, if you hurry and contact Anthony.Sebastian immediately, you may be able to get your diagram included before the re-approval is completed. But do so as quickly as you can ... and tell him that I am in agreement as documented right here. Milton Beychok 03:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

I just inserted the diagram and left a message on User talk:Anthony.Sebastian and on Talk:Boiling point/Draft that Milton Beychok approves. Henry A. Padleckas 09:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

About Missile vehicle

Hi, Henry: After a quick scan of the subject article, I did the following:

  • I created the credit line for the photo which the original uploader failed to do.
  • I removed the "Technical Team" category from the Metadata form because we have no such workgroup for articles.
  • I down-graded the status from 1 (Developed and ready for Approval) to 2 (Developing). Before upgrading to a status of 1, I suggest that:
    • The article be reformatted by creating some relevant sections, for example, a fairly brief introductory section and a "History" section with a section header. Perhaps you could break it down into even more sections.
    • Create and populate the "Related articles" subpage (equivalent to WP's "See also" section)
    • Create and populate the "External links" subpage (hyperlinks to other website information ... but not WP.)
    • Create and, if you can, populate the "Bibliography" subpage (more books and journal articles that are relevant).
  • Let it sit for a while (perhaps at least a 2-3 weeks) to see if anyone else edits/add/deletes, revises the article.

Best regards, Milton Beychok 21:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)