User talk:Alexander Liptak: Difference between revisions
imported>Sandy Harris |
imported>Sandy Harris (→Questions: add a sentence) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
== Questions == | == Questions == | ||
Following a pointer from Rational Wiki [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:What_is_going_on_at_Citizendium%3F#November_2012], I find that you posted a number of images to Wikimedia commons and later filed a DMCA takedown notice [http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:DMCA_LIPTAK.pdf] to have them removed. I suppose I could go search talk pages for the story, but it seems simpler to just ask what that was about. | Following a pointer from Rational Wiki [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:What_is_going_on_at_Citizendium%3F#November_2012], I find that you posted a number of images to Wikimedia commons and later filed a DMCA takedown notice [http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:DMCA_LIPTAK.pdf] to have them removed. Now it appears that you are posting the same images here. I suppose I could go search talk pages for the story, but it seems simpler to just ask what that was about. | ||
My own understanding is that by posting here (or at WMF) you irrevocably license the images under a Creative Commons license and thereafter anyone can do almost anything with them provided they attribute the source correctly. I am not a lawyer, but as I see it even though our servers are (unfortunately, in my view) located in the US, the DMCA is irrelevant since it deals with copyright violations and we have a duly licensed copy. | My own understanding is that by posting here (or at WMF) you irrevocably license the images under a Creative Commons license and thereafter anyone can do almost anything with them provided they attribute the source correctly. I am not a lawyer, but as I see it even though our servers are (unfortunately, in my view) located in the US, the DMCA is irrelevant since it deals with copyright violations and we have a duly licensed copy. | ||
Is your understanding different? How? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 00:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | Is your understanding different? How? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 00:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:13, 27 November 2012
Welcome!
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start. You'll probably want to know how to get started as an author. Just look at CZ:Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. Be sure to stay abreast of events via the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list (do join!) and the blog. Please also join the workgroup mailing list(s) that concern your particular interests. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forums is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any constable for help, too. Me, for instance! Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun! Aleta Curry 03:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Questions
Following a pointer from Rational Wiki [1], I find that you posted a number of images to Wikimedia commons and later filed a DMCA takedown notice [2] to have them removed. Now it appears that you are posting the same images here. I suppose I could go search talk pages for the story, but it seems simpler to just ask what that was about.
My own understanding is that by posting here (or at WMF) you irrevocably license the images under a Creative Commons license and thereafter anyone can do almost anything with them provided they attribute the source correctly. I am not a lawyer, but as I see it even though our servers are (unfortunately, in my view) located in the US, the DMCA is irrelevant since it deals with copyright violations and we have a duly licensed copy.
Is your understanding different? How? Sandy Harris 00:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC)