Buddhist councils: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson
(Created page with "A number of '''Buddhist councils''' have been held, or alleged to have been held, over the course of the history of Buddhism. Some are recognized by particular Buddhist tradi...")
 
imported>Peter Jackson
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
A number of '''Buddhist councils''' have been held, or alleged to have been held, over the course of the history of [[Buddhism]]. Some are recognized by particular Buddhist traditions as equivalent to ecumenical councils in the Catholic and Orthodox Christianity; others are acknoledged as local.
A number of '''Buddhist councils''' have been held, or alleged to have been held, over the course of the history of [[Buddhism]]. Some are recognized by particular Buddhist traditions as equivalent to ecumenical councils in the Catholic and Orthodox Christianity; others are acknoledged as local.



Revision as of 06:27, 7 February 2013

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
Addendum [?]
 
This editable, developed Main Article is subject to a disclaimer.

A number of Buddhist councils have been held, or alleged to have been held, over the course of the history of Buddhism. Some are recognized by particular Buddhist traditions as equivalent to ecumenical councils in the Catholic and Orthodox Christianity; others are acknoledged as local.

At the present day, Mahayana Buddhism gives little prominence to councils, but they are an important part of the self-concept of Theravada Buddhism. Formerly, different Theravada countries had different lists of councils, but recently the Burmese numbering has generally prevailed.[1]

Notes

  1. "Die birmanische Zählung hat sich jedoch neuerdings allgemein durchgesetzt." Heinz Bechert, Buddhismus, Staat und Gesellschaft in den Ländern des Theravāda-Buddhismus, Alfred Metzner, Frankfurt/Berlin, volume 1, 1966, page 105, note 362