Talk:Congress of Industrial Organizations/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Saletta mNo edit summary |
imported>Richard Jensen (updated links) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::I took another read, it looks great, encyclopedic. Is there a reason for the single reference at the top of the bibliography page? I asked the copy editors to take a look and weigh in with a second opinion on the title, we'll give it 10 days? [[User:Stephen Saletta|Stephen Saletta]] 00:15, 18 April 2008 (CDT) | :::I took another read, it looks great, encyclopedic. Is there a reason for the single reference at the top of the bibliography page? I asked the copy editors to take a look and weigh in with a second opinion on the title, we'll give it 10 days? [[User:Stephen Saletta|Stephen Saletta]] 00:15, 18 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
::::I updated the links in the bibliog; the Arneson encyclopedia is more general than anything but it can go in with the others.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 01:07, 18 April 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 00:07, 18 April 2008
I thought this article was going to be about Chief Information Officers. Question, then: at what names shall we put this article, the article about Chief Information Officers, and what should reside at "CIO"? Notice, "CIO" is also the name of a magazine. Cf. also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIO What do you think? --Larry Sanger 10:38, 1 May 2007 (CDT)
- CIO is the common name for 70 years of one of the largest and best known organizations in American history. I think we can disambiguate when we have another article with similar title. Note that Wiki at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIO does a TERRIBLE job on disambiguation here (the union is listed twice, both incorrectly, and AFL-CIO is missed); this list lacks a meaningful order. And they miss Comité International Olympique . Richard Jensen 12:59, 1 May 2007 (CDT)
At first blush, this article is looking pretty good... any thoughts on moving towards approval? Stephen Saletta 21:59, 17 April 2008 (CDT)
- yes it is ready. I just fixed the bibliog. please nomnate. :) Richard Jensen 23:08, 17 April 2008 (CDT)
- I took another read, it looks great, encyclopedic. Is there a reason for the single reference at the top of the bibliography page? I asked the copy editors to take a look and weigh in with a second opinion on the title, we'll give it 10 days? Stephen Saletta 00:15, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
- I updated the links in the bibliog; the Arneson encyclopedia is more general than anything but it can go in with the others.Richard Jensen 01:07, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
- I took another read, it looks great, encyclopedic. Is there a reason for the single reference at the top of the bibliography page? I asked the copy editors to take a look and weigh in with a second opinion on the title, we'll give it 10 days? Stephen Saletta 00:15, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- History Category Check
- Politics Category Check
- Economics Category Check
- Nonstub Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Advanced Articles
- Economics Internal Articles
- History tag