CZ Talk:Council Discussions: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(→‎Results: Motion passed by majority vote)
Line 31: Line 31:


==Results==
==Results==
Three members of four have voted yes, which is a majority, and therefore the motion passes.
I will contact the Technical Staff and call their attention to this motion.
[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Anthony.Sebastian|talk]]) 18:27, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:27, 22 July 2015


This page is for members of the Citizendium Council only. Only members of the Citizendium Council may edit it. Comments by non-members will be removed. Moderators will enforce this policy through a single warning first, then a ban.


Announcements Discussions ME Announcements All recent posts Council homepage Help system

Council Discussions
Choose from the following:

Pages: ContentGovernance and PolicyStyleManagementTechnical IssuesRequests for HelpCompetitors and PressArchived Boards


Request Technical Staff to repair dysfunctional <math> markup code translation

Motion – Request Technical Staff to repair dysfunctional <math> markup code translation

Proposed by Anthony.Sebastian (talk) 21:42, 17 July 2015 (UTC)< Council Chair

Motion

Because numerous Citizendium articles contain mathematical expressions, it is important that the markup code used to formulate them be properly translated after saving the edit page. Otherwise it reflects poorly on the quality of Citizendium’s compendium of knowledge.

Accordingly the Citizendium Council requests that the technical staff, under the leadership of Greg Sabino Mullane, explore that problem, detailed at

http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Forum_Talk:Technical_Issues#Equations_using_.3Cmath.3E_are_not_type_set

and work to remedy it with high priority.

Council discussion

Member’s votes (yes/no; three 'yes' votes needed for motion to pass)

Russell D. Jones: Yes

Gareth Leng: Yes

Peter Schmitt:

Anthony.Sebastian: Yes

Results

Three members of four have voted yes, which is a majority, and therefore the motion passes.

I will contact the Technical Staff and call their attention to this motion.

Anthony.Sebastian (talk) 18:27, 22 July 2015 (UTC)