Talk:Special relativity/Definition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson |
imported>Harald van Lintel No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Broader still, I think: famously, it has something to say about mass and energy, which are not included in either of the above definitions. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 15:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC) | :Broader still, I think: famously, it has something to say about mass and energy, which are not included in either of the above definitions. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 15:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
::Yes I agree; will look into it. [[User:Harald van Lintel|Harald van Lintel]] ([[User talk:Harald van Lintel|talk]]) 15:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:21, 15 May 2017
Theory of space and time? Or theory of motion? or?
"Theory of space and time" isn't really what it is, or arguably, it's not at all what it is. "Theory of motion" is more appropriate, as it really is about the effects of speed and it helps to distinguish from general relativity. We should compare different popular definitions and choose one of the most accurate, or a merge of two of the most accurate descriptions (To Be Done). Harald van Lintel (talk) 10:51, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Broader still, I think: famously, it has something to say about mass and energy, which are not included in either of the above definitions. Peter Jackson (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Yes I agree; will look into it. Harald van Lintel (talk) 15:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC)