Talk:African American literature: Difference between revisions
imported>Russell Potter No edit summary |
imported>Russell Potter |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== Deleted section:Balkanization == | == Deleted section:Balkanization == | ||
:Quoted material: | |||
Despite these views, some [[Conservatism|conservative]] academics and intellectuals argue that African American literature only exists as part of a [[balkanization]] of literature over the last few decades or as an extension of the [[culture wars]] into the field of literature.<ref>Theodore Dalrymple, "[http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/23/may05/dalrymple.htm An imaginary 'scandal']," ''The New Criterion'' 23, no. 9 (May 2005); Richard H. Brodhead, "[http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/pubs/A20/brodhead2.html On the Debate Over Multiculturalism]," ''On Common Ground '', no. 7 (Fall 1996), (accessed July 6, 2005).</ref> According to these critics, literature is splitting into distinct and separate groupings because of the rise of [[identity politics]] in the United States and other parts of the world. These critics reject bringing identity politics into literature because this would mean that "only women could write about women for women, and only Blacks about Blacks for Blacks."<ref>Dalrymple, "[http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/23/may05/dalrymple.htm imaginary 'scandal']." (accessed July 6, 2005).</ref> | Despite these views, some [[Conservatism|conservative]] academics and intellectuals argue that African American literature only exists as part of a [[balkanization]] of literature over the last few decades or as an extension of the [[culture wars]] into the field of literature.<ref>Theodore Dalrymple, "[http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/23/may05/dalrymple.htm An imaginary 'scandal']," ''The New Criterion'' 23, no. 9 (May 2005); Richard H. Brodhead, "[http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/pubs/A20/brodhead2.html On the Debate Over Multiculturalism]," ''On Common Ground '', no. 7 (Fall 1996), (accessed July 6, 2005).</ref> According to these critics, literature is splitting into distinct and separate groupings because of the rise of [[identity politics]] in the United States and other parts of the world. These critics reject bringing identity politics into literature because this would mean that "only women could write about women for women, and only Blacks about Blacks for Blacks."<ref>Dalrymple, "[http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/23/may05/dalrymple.htm imaginary 'scandal']." (accessed July 6, 2005).</ref> | ||
People opposed to this group-based approach to writing say that it limits the ability of literature to explore the overall human condition and, more importantly, judges ethnic writers merely on the basis of their race. These critics reject this judgment and say it defies the meaning of works like Ralph Ellison's ''Invisible Man'', in which Ellison's main character is invisible because people see him as nothing more than a Black man.<ref>Paul Greenberg, "[http://www.townhall.com/columnists/paulgreenberg/pg20050615.shtml I hate that (The rise of identity journalism)]," townhall.com, June 15, 2005 (accessed July 6, 2005).</ref> Others criticize special treatment of any ethnic-based genre of literature. For example, [[Robert Hayden]], the first African-American [[Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress]], once said (paraphrasing the comment by the black composer [[Duke Ellington]] about jazz and music), "There is no such thing as Black literature. There's good literature and bad. And that's all."<ref>[http://www.eiu.edu/~eng1002/authors/hayden/haydenbio.html Biography of Robert Hayden] (accessed August 25, 2005).</ref> | People opposed to this group-based approach to writing say that it limits the ability of literature to explore the overall human condition and, more importantly, judges ethnic writers merely on the basis of their race. These critics reject this judgment and say it defies the meaning of works like Ralph Ellison's ''Invisible Man'', in which Ellison's main character is invisible because people see him as nothing more than a Black man.<ref>Paul Greenberg, "[http://www.townhall.com/columnists/paulgreenberg/pg20050615.shtml I hate that (The rise of identity journalism)]," townhall.com, June 15, 2005 (accessed July 6, 2005).</ref> Others criticize special treatment of any ethnic-based genre of literature. For example, [[Robert Hayden]], the first African-American [[Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress]], once said (paraphrasing the comment by the black composer [[Duke Ellington]] about jazz and music), "There is no such thing as Black literature. There's good literature and bad. And that's all."<ref>[http://www.eiu.edu/~eng1002/authors/hayden/haydenbio.html Biography of Robert Hayden] (accessed August 25, 2005).</ref> | ||
:end quoted material | |||
::This section is really just a summary of a number of right-wing attacks on the field of study of African-American literature from people who feel for extrinsic reasons that it is not legitimate. There is no such disagreement among ''literary'' critics, no "opposing view" to the proposal that Af-Am literature is a legitimate field. The criticisms of "identity politics" should be moved to an entry on [[Identity politics]], where both sides of ''that'' debate can be described, but the fact that American conservatives object to Af-Am Literature, or Women's Studies, or other such fields isn't to my mind a fact about these fields, but a fact about American conservatism, and should be discussed there. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 15:29, 20 April 2007 (CDT) | ::This section is really just a summary of a number of right-wing attacks on the field of study of African-American literature from people who feel for extrinsic reasons that it is not legitimate. There is no such disagreement among ''literary'' critics, no "opposing view" to the proposal that Af-Am literature is a legitimate field. The criticisms of "identity politics" should be moved to an entry on [[Identity politics]], where both sides of ''that'' debate can be described, but the fact that American conservatives object to Af-Am Literature, or Women's Studies, or other such fields isn't to my mind a fact about these fields, but a fact about American conservatism, and should be discussed there. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 15:29, 20 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 15:30, 20 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Literature Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Hillie Plantinga 14:16, 29 March 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Removed during Cleanup
Deleted section:Balkanization
- Quoted material:
Despite these views, some conservative academics and intellectuals argue that African American literature only exists as part of a balkanization of literature over the last few decades or as an extension of the culture wars into the field of literature.[1] According to these critics, literature is splitting into distinct and separate groupings because of the rise of identity politics in the United States and other parts of the world. These critics reject bringing identity politics into literature because this would mean that "only women could write about women for women, and only Blacks about Blacks for Blacks."[2]
People opposed to this group-based approach to writing say that it limits the ability of literature to explore the overall human condition and, more importantly, judges ethnic writers merely on the basis of their race. These critics reject this judgment and say it defies the meaning of works like Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man, in which Ellison's main character is invisible because people see him as nothing more than a Black man.[3] Others criticize special treatment of any ethnic-based genre of literature. For example, Robert Hayden, the first African-American Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress, once said (paraphrasing the comment by the black composer Duke Ellington about jazz and music), "There is no such thing as Black literature. There's good literature and bad. And that's all."[4]
- end quoted material
- This section is really just a summary of a number of right-wing attacks on the field of study of African-American literature from people who feel for extrinsic reasons that it is not legitimate. There is no such disagreement among literary critics, no "opposing view" to the proposal that Af-Am literature is a legitimate field. The criticisms of "identity politics" should be moved to an entry on Identity politics, where both sides of that debate can be described, but the fact that American conservatives object to Af-Am Literature, or Women's Studies, or other such fields isn't to my mind a fact about these fields, but a fact about American conservatism, and should be discussed there. Russell Potter 15:29, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
- ↑ Theodore Dalrymple, "An imaginary 'scandal'," The New Criterion 23, no. 9 (May 2005); Richard H. Brodhead, "On the Debate Over Multiculturalism," On Common Ground , no. 7 (Fall 1996), (accessed July 6, 2005).
- ↑ Dalrymple, "imaginary 'scandal'." (accessed July 6, 2005).
- ↑ Paul Greenberg, "I hate that (The rise of identity journalism)," townhall.com, June 15, 2005 (accessed July 6, 2005).
- ↑ Biography of Robert Hayden (accessed August 25, 2005).
- Literature Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Literature Advanced Articles
- Literature Nonstub Articles
- Literature Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Literature Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Literature Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Literature Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Literature External Articles
- Literature Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Literature Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup
- Pages with broken file links