CZ:Approval Announcements: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sculerati
m (Text replacement - "Line (geometry)" to "Line (Euclidean geometry)")
 
(360 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==<font size="3" color="660000"> May 8, 2007 </font>==
<!-- Please do not delete this initial entry or permit it to go lower on the page; it redirects people to the Approval Process page. -->
{{click|image=Natural science button.png|link=CZ:Workgroups#Natural_Sciences|width=25px|height=25px}}
Go to the [[CZ:Approval_Process | Approval Process]] page for information on how to initiate the approval process for an article.
:'''Newly approved articles:'''
[[Image:Prime rectangles.png|thumb|left|300px|'''The prime number 11 illustrated with square tiles.''' 12 squares can be arranged into a rectangle with sides of length 3 and 4, so 12 is not a prime number. There is no way to form a full rectangle more than one square wide with 11 squares, so 11 is a prime number.]]
Two newly approved articles:  [[Complex number]] and [[Prime number]]. These are the ''first'' mathematics articles ever nominated for approval!


Like the first Biology articles, these articles likely need copyediting and the nominating editors can contact me to effect these.[[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 08:49, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
==<font size="3" color="660000"> Current nominations </font>==
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="border-width: 0px 0px 0px 0; width="100%"
|-
| style="width: 70%;"|
==<font size="3" color="660000"> July 2015 </font>==
{{Notice|Pompeii|SH|}}


*Like the ''first'' Biology article, there seems to be discussion that a line or two is not accurate, or at least well stated, in one of the articles. Is this a copyedit? No, but if 3 editors can quickly agree to fix it, a version 1.1. of a "glitched' newly approved article can be up within 24 hours.
==<font size="3" color="660000"> August 2012 </font>==
{{Notice|Europe|S|}}


Congratulations Mathematics Workgroup! Just as no book was ever published (to my knowlege anyway) without need for an erratum (if a reader looked closely enough), these articles are a real accomplishment on the part of co-operative effort to synthesize a good article on the wiki.
==<font size="3" color="660000"> July 2012 </font>==
{{Notice|Active attack|NAA|}}
{{Notice|Passive attack|NAA|}}
{{Notice|Cryptology|NAA|}}


*Hopefully, editors will soon reach consensus on copyedits, and the workgroup will look over both articles for any outstanding issues to be QUICKLY corrected.
==<font size="3" color="660000"> June 2012 </font>==
{{Notice|Economics|S|}}


*Other changes, and further development of each article, will - of course- continue on the draft pages and ''all'' are welcome to author there.
==<font size="3" color="660000"> April 2012 </font>==
{{Notice|Alice and Bob|NAA|}}


*Now that the Mathematics group has learned how it's done, we look forward to many more articles from you.
==<font size="3" color="660000"> March 2012 </font>==
{{Notice|Randomized controlled trial|AA|reapproval}}


:'''Articles newly nominated for approval''':
{{Notice|ASIMO|AA|approval}}


==<font size="3" color="660000"> May 3, 2007 </font>==
{{Notice|Boiling point|N|reapproval}}
[[Image:bookshelf.jpg|right|200 px]]
This Thursday we'd like to focus on '''developing articles that require editors' and authors' attention'''.
{{click|image=Humanities button.png|link=CZ:Workgroups#Humanities|width=25px|height=25px}} [[Literature]]


The lead article in the Literature Workgroup is coming along ''beautifully''. Are there Literature editors out there who have not yet applied for Editorship? Granted, it's a steep hurdle for qualifications - but if you have a Ph D in Literature or related fields, please e-mail '''personnel@citizendium.org'''.
==<font size="3" color="660000"> December 2010 </font>==
[[Literature|This is an important article that is on the verge of blossoming]]. Eyes wanted.
{{Notice|Homeopathy|AA|reapproval}}
{{Notice|Oxytocin|N}}
{{Notice|World of Warcraft|RAA|reapproval}}
|
{{Approval Announcements Archive}}


<font size="2" color="660000"> '''All interested editors, authors and readers, please see''' [[Literature]].</font>
{{Box.green|{{:Template:ApprovalProcessListBrief}}}}


:'''UPDATE:''' Now nominated.
{{Image|Pompeii's forum.jpg|right|250px|The forum at [[Pompeii]], with [[Mount Vesuvius|Mt. Vesuvius]] in the background.}}
|}
----
----
'''New medium of the ''last'' "turn of the century":''' [[Telephone Newspaper]]
{{TOC|left}}
[[Image:Stentor_reading.jpg|thumb|200 px]]
==<font size="3" color="660000"> November 2010 </font>==
It's an obscure topic, true- but a fascinating one! [[Telephone Newspaper]] is a window into the past development of journalism in electronic media - albeit ''very'' low voltage electronic media. Is this article properly classified as to workgoup? It certainly seems that nomination for approval should be the next step by the editor(s) who can perform due diligence and verify accuracy. Will it languish, fully formed, for want of approval?
{{Notice|Oxytocin|NAA}}
{{Notice|Acid rain|N}}


'''''Where'' is its nominating editor?'''
==<font size="3" color="660000"> October 2010 </font>==
{{Notice|Schröder-Bernstein property|N}}
{{Notice|Schröder-Bernstein theorem|N}}


[[Telephone Newspaper]]  awaits you!
==<font size="3" color="660000"> August 2010 </font>==
{{Image|PlaneViaLines.png|200px|right|Every point ''F'' on the line ''DE'' belongs to the plane through given points ''A'', ''B'' and ''C'', provided that ''D'' belongs to ''AB'', ''E'' belongs to ''BC'', and ''D'', ''E'' do not coincide with ''B''.}}
{{Notice|Explosives|NAA}}
{{Notice|Catalytic reforming|NAA}}
{{Notice|Petroleum naphtha|NAA}}
{{Notice|Plane (geometry)|N}}
{{Notice|Jet Set Willy|RAA}}
{{Notice|Cryptanalysis|NHAA}}


:'''UPDATE:''' Now nominated.
==<font size="3" color="660000"> July 2010 </font>==
----
{{Notice|Ellipse|N}}
Here's one we ''have'' the editors for; getting this article into shape for approval nomination requires meeting a ''different'' sort of challenge.
{{Notice|Domain Name System|AA}}
This article is inter-disciplinary to its core, at least among the sciences, including social sciences, and &mdash; it's in the workgroup &mdash; philosophy, too.
{{Image|Wowraid.jpg|right|250px|The MMORPG World of Warcraft.}}
 
{{Notice|World of Warcraft|RAA}}
*Can there be a swarm of authors and editors that buzz this one into high polish?
*Or will it continue its tradition of being one of Citizendium's magnets for contention ?
 
[[Scientific method]] is developed, and has been developing &mdash; as well as been deconstructed &mdash; for a ''very'' long time.
 
'''Now is the time for all good men and women to review:'''
 
[[Scientific method|'''SCIENTIFIC METHOD''']]
 
----
 
:'''Articles newly nominated for approval''':
{{click|image=Natural science button.png|link=CZ:Workgroups#Natural_Sciences|width=25px|height=25px}}
 
'''Two mathematics articles are now up for approval:''' [[Complex number]] and [[Prime number]]. These are the ''first'' mathematics articles ever nominated for approval!
I've copied the nominating editor's remarks from the Forums below:
''Note that these articles can still be improved before the approval takes hold on Sunday, May 6. In particular, a few sections were rearranged or moved to other articles recently, so the current version probably doesn't flow as well as it used to from section to section. But also there are several comments on their discussion pages that haven't been addressed yet; while many of them can wait for the future, we might as well try to get as good a first version approved as we can. So be bold! Greg Martin
''
----
no new articles have been approved in the last two days
 
==<font size="3" color="660000"> May 1, 2007 </font>==
 
:'''Articles newly nominated for approval''':
{{click|image=Natural science button.png|link=CZ:Workgroups#Natural_Sciences|width=25px|height=25px}}  
 
Two mathematics articles are now up for approval: [[Complex number]] and [[Prime number]]. These are the ''first'' mathematics articles ever nominated for approval!
I've copied the nominating editor's remarks from the Forums below:
<font size="2" color="660000">'''''Note that these articles can still be improved before the approval takes hold on Sunday, May 6. In particular, a few sections were rearranged or moved to other articles recently, so the current version probably doesn't flow as well as it used to from section to section. But also there are several comments on their discussion pages that haven't been addressed yet; while many of them can wait for the future, we might as well try to get as good a first version approved as we can. So be bold! Greg Martin'''''</font>
 
:'''Newly Approved Articles''':
 
{{click|image=Humanities button.png|link=CZ:Workgroups#Humanities|width=25px|height=25px}}  
'''Our very first History articles to be approved!'''
*[[Pittsburgh%2C_History_to_1800]] 
*[[Pittsburgh%2C_History_since_1800]]
 
CONGRATULATIONS!!
 
==<font size="3" color="660000"> April 27, 2007 </font>==
 
'''This announcement is for the wiki hackers among us:  the skin for Approved articles needs a facial.'''
 
What's needed? (All registered users should feel free to add to & edit this list)
 
* Approved articles need a look that tells the user that he or she is reading an approved article
 
* A conventional means of indicating important facts (such as:  nominating editor, date approved, list of approving editors) is also needed
 
* A clear disclaimer


===What's been said so far?===
==<font size="3" color="660000"> June 2010 </font>==
Here are threads on the forum that all deserve our attention (please add to these):
{{Notice|Cypherpunk|SAA}}
 
{{Notice|L. J. Hanifan|SH}}
*Article Approval notice box size too large? http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,861.0.html
{{Notice|Kamehameha I|HSAA}}
 
{{Notice|Arthur J. Altmeyer|SH}}
*Re: Proof versions of articles« Reply #32 on: April 19, 2007, 04:43:23 PM »[http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,831.msg6357.html#msg6357]
{{Notice|Edwin E. Witte|SH}}
 
{{Notice|Richard Hofstadter|H|reapproval}}
*Should there be a Group Approval Template? [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,392.0.html]
{{Notice|Doom (video game)|RAA}}
 
{{Notice|Social capital|S}}
Here are current pages on Citizendium that have to do with Approval templates:
{{Image|Scarborough-castle-barbican-walls.jpg|right|250px|Gateway (''left'') and bridge of [[Scarborough Castle]] before the town's North Bay.}}
 
{{Notice|Great Siege of Scarborough Castle‎|H}}
*Our current Nomination for Approval Template http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Template:ToApprove
{{Notice|Kerckhoffs' Principle|NAA}}
 
===Invitation to link sandbox trials here===
(To make your own sandbox page, edit your user page and create a link to the sandbox page as if it already existed, like this: <nowiki>[[User:Nancy_Sculerati/Sandbox]]</nowiki>.  After completing the edit, you'll see the red link; just click on the red link to start the new page.  Any author can create a page anywhere in the same way. -- as per Pat Palmer)
 
Perhaps drafts of templates and styles for approved articles might be linked here?
*http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=User_talk:Larry_Sanger/Approved_in_pagehist&oldid=100084129
*http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User:Nancy_Sculerati/Sandbox
*[http://www.harbormist.com/pat/Biology.htm http://www.harbormist.com/pat/Biology.htm] - fake page with example of a watermark
 
 
 
==<font size="3" color="660000">April 26, 2007 </font>==
 
'''Developing articles that need editors to nominate them for approval''' (''or'' indicate what is needed before such nomination can be made):
 
* [[First Punic War]]
 
Copying Jason's post from the Forums [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,844.0.html]: I have a favor to ask of the History Workgroup.  
The article [[First Punic War]] appears high on Google searches. It has been steadily climibing, currently 10 to 12 in rank on a search for first punic war. If this article can be pushed along to approved status, this would be good PR.
-Jason Potkanski Tech Lead
 
 
<font size="3" color="660000">April 24, 2007 </font>
 
Our first of the Tuesday Night Rundowns on approved articles begins! Our first set of announcements is itself an "announcement of firsts".
 
----
 
'''Developing articles that need editors to nominate them for approval''' (''or'' indicate what is needed before such nomination can be made):
 
::'''Calling Mathematics editors to review:'''
*[[Prime number]]
*[[Complex number]]
 
These are candidates for our first Mathematics articles for nomination. ''Where'' are our editors?
----
 
::'''Articles newly nominated for approval''':
'''Humanities''' {{click|image=Humanities button.png|link=CZ:Workgroups#Humanities|width=25px|height=25px}}  
Our very first History articles to be nominated!
*[[Pittsburgh%2C_History_to_1800]] 
*[[Pittsburgh%2C_History_since_1800]]
 
----


'''Just Approved Articles'''
==<font size="3" color="660000"> May 2010 </font>==
{{Image|Gasoline Fuel.jpg|right|150px|Automobiles for personal use are the largest consumers of [[gasoline]].}}
{{Notice|Line (Euclidean geometry)|N}}
{{Notice|Set theory|N}}
{{Notice|Gasoline|NAA|reapproval}}
{{Notice|Cryptography|NAA}}
{{Notice|Covariance|N}}
{{Notice|Geometric sequence|N}}
{{Notice|Countable set|N}}
{{Notice|Neighbourhood (topology)|N}}


{{click|image=Applied arts button.png|link=CZ:Workgroups#Applied Arts and Sciences|width=25px|height=25px}}  
==<font size="3" color="660000"> April 2010 </font>==
{{Image|Anthracite coal.jpg|right|275px|Anthracite [[coal]] (American 25 cent coin shown for scale).}}
{{Notice|HUBO|AA}}
{{Notice|Coal|NAA}}
{{Notice|Conventional coal-fired power plant|NAA}}


*[[Infant colic]] Our very first Health Sciences article to be approved!
{{Article Lists}}

Latest revision as of 02:09, 8 March 2024

Go to the Approval Process page for information on how to initiate the approval process for an article.

Current nominations

July 2015

Pompeii has been approved.

August 2012

Europe has been approved.

July 2012

Active attack has been approved.
Passive attack has been approved.
Cryptology has been approved.

June 2012

Economics has been approved.

April 2012

Alice and Bob has been approved.

March 2012

A new version of Randomized controlled trial has been approved.
ASIMO has been approved.
A new version of Boiling point has been approved.

December 2010

A new version of Homeopathy has been approved.
Oxytocin has been approved.
A new version of World of Warcraft has been approved.


Approval Process
(PD) Photo: Central Intelligence Agency
The forum at Pompeii, with Mt. Vesuvius in the background.

November 2010

Oxytocin has been approved.
Acid rain has been approved.

October 2010

Schröder-Bernstein property has been approved.
Schröder-Bernstein theorem has been approved.

August 2010

(CC) Diagram: Boris Tsirelson
Every point F on the line DE belongs to the plane through given points A, B and C, provided that D belongs to AB, E belongs to BC, and D, E do not coincide with B.
Explosives has been approved.
Catalytic reforming has been approved.
Petroleum naphtha has been approved.
Plane (geometry) has been approved.
Jet Set Willy has been approved.
Cryptanalysis has been approved.

July 2010

Ellipse has been approved.
Domain Name System has been approved.
(FU) Image: Blizzard Entertainment
The MMORPG World of Warcraft.
World of Warcraft has been approved.

June 2010

Cypherpunk has been approved.
L. J. Hanifan has been approved.
Kamehameha I has been approved.
Arthur J. Altmeyer has been approved.
Edwin E. Witte has been approved.
A new version of Richard Hofstadter has been approved.
Doom (video game) has been approved.
Social capital has been approved.
(CC) Image: Dongyi Liu
Gateway (left) and bridge of Scarborough Castle before the town's North Bay.
Great Siege of Scarborough Castle‎ has been approved.
Kerckhoffs' Principle has been approved.

May 2010

(PD) Photo: U.S. Government
Automobiles for personal use are the largest consumers of gasoline.
Line (Euclidean geometry) has been approved.
Set theory has been approved.
A new version of Gasoline has been approved.
Cryptography has been approved.
Covariance has been approved.
Geometric sequence has been approved.
Countable set has been approved.
Neighbourhood (topology) has been approved.

April 2010

(PD) Photo: U.S. Geological Survey / Andrew Silver
Anthracite coal (American 25 cent coin shown for scale).
HUBO has been approved.
Coal has been approved.
Conventional coal-fired power plant has been approved.


Citizendium Article Lists
CZ Articles | Subpages | Main Articles with Citable Versions | Citable Versions | Developed | All pages (incl. non-articles)

|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"|  |}