Complementary and alternative medicine: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(copyediting)
m (Text replacement - "National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine" to "National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine")
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
'''Alternative medicine''' is a set of therapies that are considered whole systems of healthcare that are outside the realm of mainstream healthcare due to their incompatability with current scientific thoughtComplementary medicine is comprised of those systems, or parts of systems, that have shown some efficacy experimentally and therefore are frequently used in conjunction with the mainstream. These practices include [[acupuncture]], [[homeopathy]], [[herbal medicine]], [[faith healing]], [[chiropractic]], and [[prayer]]. Critics argue that these practices are not scientifically or clinically verified, and can lead patients to harm in delaying treatment, and point to evidence of [[scams]] and [[fraud]] perpetuated by practitioners of alternative medicine.
'''Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)''' is a catch-all phrase used in a variety of ways that can encompass a broad variety of concernsIt might be used, on the one hand, for any set of health, medical or therapeutic practices not blessed by generally accepted conventional [[medicine]] and thus not covered by [[medical insurance]].  It might also refer, used by a different person, to practices believed by medical regulators to be dangerous, deceptive or ineffective.  It might even refer to matters on which physicians and biomedical scientists have no opinion, either because no studies have been done or no opinion sought.  Public debates include extreme viewpoints in conflicting directions, from, on the one hand, banning anything and everything not blessed by the establishment, and, on the other hand, to providing individual freedom to try a wide variety of therapies as long as they are not actually banned as dangerous or illegal and as long as no patently unprovable claims of efficacy are being made to potential clients.


Critics of alternative medicine seek alternative explanations for the claims that advocates of such therapies make, mostly in the use of the [[placebo effect]], a surprisingly powerful psychological effect where a person who thinks that a medical intervention is effective boosts their own health. Along with this, patients of alternative treatments are said to exhibit a self-delusional bias, where they accept successes and disregard failures for their favorite alternative practices while not doing similarly for mainstream medicine ([[confirmation bias]]). While some defend alternative medicine on the basis that it is not harmful, there are problems with this: as alternative treatments are often not rigorously tested, it can be difficult to know the side effects of some alternative treatments, especially as the natural sources used for such treatments do not often allow for strict control of doses. This has been observed with the incompatibility between [[St John's Wort]], a herbal remedy often prescribed by alternative medicine practitioners for [[depression]] and a variety of drugs including [[AIDS]] and [[heart disease]] medications<ref>Stephen Barrett, [http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/DSH/stjohn.html St. John's Wort], ''Quackwatch''</ref><ref>National Institute of Mental Health (US), [http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/depression/complete-publication.shtml Depression]</ref>. Critics of alternative medicine also note that it can be dangerous if patients delay seeking conventional treatment in preference for use of alternative medicine.
The underlying problem is easy to identify: who gets to decide?  The U. S. [[Food and Drug Administration]] is supposed to prevent companies or individuals from marketing drugs or food which are not known to be safe, and also to prevent anyone from making claims of efficacy which are not supported by independent studies using accepted scientific methodology.  At the national research, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) is part of the U.S. [[National Institutes of Health]]. For a taxonomy of CAM techniques drawn from both NCCAM and the U.K. Parliament committee on CAM, see [[integrative medicine]].


Some alternative treatments have been tested through scientific means and when found beneficial have been integrated into normal medical practice. An example of this is [[acupuncture]], which many doctors now use as part of pain relief for some ailments because of the release of [[endorphins]]<ref>NHS Direct Health Encyclopedia (UK), [http://www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/articles/article.aspx?articleid=6 Acupuncture]</ref>. Some scientific studies have shown that it is effective but have not confirmed the metaphysics upon which it is based—that of chi, "vital energy" or the existence of 'meridians'.<ref>Robert Todd Carroll, "[http://skepdic.com/acupunc.html Acupuncture]" in the ''[[Skeptic's Dictionary]]''</ref>.
A common distinction is that while there may be varying levels of efficacy data both for complementary and alternative medicine, complementary disciplines are open to collaboration with mainstream medicine and also other complementary practitioners. Alternative practitioners, however, present themselves as a literal "alternative" to conventional medicine. NCCAM also uses the term "whole system" for alternative paradigms that present themselves as "whole" alternatives to conventional medicine.


== References ==
But many state agencies also become involved in regulating what is allowed or not allowed.  For example, while medical insurance may not recommend or pay for therapeutic massage, chiropractic manipulation, or acupuncture (just for example), many states require practitioners of these arts to be licensed by a state agency intended to guarantee a certain minimum level of competence and training.
<references />
 
The history of struggles and disputes over medical and health approaches is better told in articles related to a specific unofficial health approach.  It is easy to consult a regulating authority to find out what therapies and approaches are "official" (and by definition, everything else may be considered CAM).  But the issue of whether a specific therapy is "complementary", "harmful", "useful", or whatever, is open to much and passionate dispute.  For specific cases, see [[Complementary_and_alternative_medicine/Related_Articles]].
 
==Notes==
{{Reflist}}
 
[[Category:Complementary and alternative medicine]][[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]

Latest revision as of 11:19, 17 August 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is a catch-all phrase used in a variety of ways that can encompass a broad variety of concerns. It might be used, on the one hand, for any set of health, medical or therapeutic practices not blessed by generally accepted conventional medicine and thus not covered by medical insurance. It might also refer, used by a different person, to practices believed by medical regulators to be dangerous, deceptive or ineffective. It might even refer to matters on which physicians and biomedical scientists have no opinion, either because no studies have been done or no opinion sought. Public debates include extreme viewpoints in conflicting directions, from, on the one hand, banning anything and everything not blessed by the establishment, and, on the other hand, to providing individual freedom to try a wide variety of therapies as long as they are not actually banned as dangerous or illegal and as long as no patently unprovable claims of efficacy are being made to potential clients.

The underlying problem is easy to identify: who gets to decide? The U. S. Food and Drug Administration is supposed to prevent companies or individuals from marketing drugs or food which are not known to be safe, and also to prevent anyone from making claims of efficacy which are not supported by independent studies using accepted scientific methodology. At the national research, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) is part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. For a taxonomy of CAM techniques drawn from both NCCAM and the U.K. Parliament committee on CAM, see integrative medicine.

A common distinction is that while there may be varying levels of efficacy data both for complementary and alternative medicine, complementary disciplines are open to collaboration with mainstream medicine and also other complementary practitioners. Alternative practitioners, however, present themselves as a literal "alternative" to conventional medicine. NCCAM also uses the term "whole system" for alternative paradigms that present themselves as "whole" alternatives to conventional medicine.

But many state agencies also become involved in regulating what is allowed or not allowed. For example, while medical insurance may not recommend or pay for therapeutic massage, chiropractic manipulation, or acupuncture (just for example), many states require practitioners of these arts to be licensed by a state agency intended to guarantee a certain minimum level of competence and training.

The history of struggles and disputes over medical and health approaches is better told in articles related to a specific unofficial health approach. It is easy to consult a regulating authority to find out what therapies and approaches are "official" (and by definition, everything else may be considered CAM). But the issue of whether a specific therapy is "complementary", "harmful", "useful", or whatever, is open to much and passionate dispute. For specific cases, see Complementary_and_alternative_medicine/Related_Articles.

Notes