User talk:RayTomes: Difference between revisions
imported>David Tribe No edit summary |
imported>Robert Tito m (Cyclic and cyclicity) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We crossed paths, Ray ;0). Ignore my comment elsewhere relating to pix, but still you should make sure any Wikipedia stuff is appropriatedly acknowledged. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]]` | We crossed paths, Ray ;0). Ignore my comment elsewhere relating to pix, but still you should make sure any Wikipedia stuff is appropriatedly acknowledged. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]]` | ||
== Cyclic and cyclicity == | |||
Hi Ray, | |||
This didn't take a lot ot time to think about. Since I am in the as the americans call it natural sciences I know some about cyclic processes. The reason cyclicity faces alot of objection as a separate area is because it has angles with every area even outside "hard-core" science. For you to start I would take three major areas: chemistry, physics and math. Try to see where you can find a place to get a start - as elavoration. | |||
For one I can tell you physical science is one place to create your tree of cyclicity. | |||
But the generalities belong once again in math, and are related to physics. | |||
Hope this is something like an anchor where to start. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] 22:52, 29 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:52, 29 January 2007
| Citizendium Getting Started | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick Start | About us | Help system | Start a new article | For Wikipedians | |||
Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitions • add metadata • edit new pages
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun! Robert Tito 16:52, 29 January 2007 (CST)
We crossed paths, Ray ;0). Ignore my comment elsewhere relating to pix, but still you should make sure any Wikipedia stuff is appropriatedly acknowledged. David Tribe`
Cyclic and cyclicity
Hi Ray,
This didn't take a lot ot time to think about. Since I am in the as the americans call it natural sciences I know some about cyclic processes. The reason cyclicity faces alot of objection as a separate area is because it has angles with every area even outside "hard-core" science. For you to start I would take three major areas: chemistry, physics and math. Try to see where you can find a place to get a start - as elavoration. For one I can tell you physical science is one place to create your tree of cyclicity. But the generalities belong once again in math, and are related to physics. Hope this is something like an anchor where to start. Robert Tito 22:52, 29 January 2007 (CST)