Talk:Compiler/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Johnson No edit summary |
imported>Peter Schmitt m (Talk:List of compiler optimizations moved to Talk:Compiler/Archive 2: move to archive) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
==Title== | |||
Shouldn't this be "List of compiler optimizations"? --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 15:17, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
: Yes, it should be, but I can't remember how to rename an article... Gimme a second... --[[User:Nick Johnson|Nick Johnson]] 09:47, 12 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
::Ah, we can't — that feature has been turned off, and is only available to constables and above. I've asked about it at the discussion forums, but they seem to be down at the moment, so I can't go back to check for any responses. --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 09:51, 12 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
| | |||
| | =can we merge this into compilers?= | ||
I have copied the entire list into [[compiler]], so I'm not sure it's helpful to keep this as a separate list. It's generally a bad idea to duplicate information, and these items are possibly better introduced and summarized on the compiler page, in which case, maybe we should delete this extra copy of them. I'm against keeping a duplicate.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 04:15, 9 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:40, 16 February 2010
Title
Shouldn't this be "List of compiler optimizations"? --Peter J. King Talk 15:17, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, it should be, but I can't remember how to rename an article... Gimme a second... --Nick Johnson 09:47, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
- Ah, we can't — that feature has been turned off, and is only available to constables and above. I've asked about it at the discussion forums, but they seem to be down at the moment, so I can't go back to check for any responses. --Peter J. King Talk 09:51, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
can we merge this into compilers?
I have copied the entire list into compiler, so I'm not sure it's helpful to keep this as a separate list. It's generally a bad idea to duplicate information, and these items are possibly better introduced and summarized on the compiler page, in which case, maybe we should delete this extra copy of them. I'm against keeping a duplicate.Pat Palmer 04:15, 9 May 2007 (CDT)