Talk:Artificial neural network: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Dvorak (Undo revision 100317763 by John Dvorak (Talk)) |
imported>John Pate No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
==Substantial addition== | |||
I joined CZ a year ago but haven't made many edits. how does this look?[[User:John Pate|John Pate]] 17:56, 4 July 2008 (CDT) | |||
==Article name== | ==Article name== | ||
Line 5: | Line 9: | ||
Should this perhaps be at [[Artificial neural network]]? I did a quick Google search, and a lot of reputable sources seem to use the lower-case. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 15:15, 10 April 2008 (CDT) | Should this perhaps be at [[Artificial neural network]]? I did a quick Google search, and a lot of reputable sources seem to use the lower-case. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 15:15, 10 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
:I assumed that two weeks was long enough for people to raise an argument for keeping the current name :). I <i>did</i> move it, but it was a lot sloppier than I had expected. Let me know if I am doing it right. [[User:John Dvorak|John Dvorak]] 19:43, 23 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
[[ |
Latest revision as of 16:56, 4 July 2008
Substantial addition
I joined CZ a year ago but haven't made many edits. how does this look?John Pate 17:56, 4 July 2008 (CDT)
Article name
Should this perhaps be at Artificial neural network? I did a quick Google search, and a lot of reputable sources seem to use the lower-case. J. Noel Chiappa 15:15, 10 April 2008 (CDT)
- I assumed that two weeks was long enough for people to raise an argument for keeping the current name :). I did move it, but it was a lot sloppier than I had expected. Let me know if I am doing it right. John Dvorak 19:43, 23 April 2008 (CDT)