Talk:Artificial neural network: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Dvorak
(Undo revision 100317763 by John Dvorak (Talk))
imported>John Pate
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
==Substantial addition==
I joined CZ a year ago but haven't made many edits. how does this look?[[User:John Pate|John Pate]] 17:56, 4 July 2008 (CDT)


==Article name==
==Article name==
Line 5: Line 9:
Should this perhaps be at [[Artificial neural network]]? I did a quick Google search, and a lot of reputable sources seem to use the lower-case. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 15:15, 10 April 2008 (CDT)
Should this perhaps be at [[Artificial neural network]]? I did a quick Google search, and a lot of reputable sources seem to use the lower-case. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 15:15, 10 April 2008 (CDT)


 
:I assumed that two weeks was long enough for people to raise an argument for keeping the current name :). I <i>did</i> move it, but it was a lot sloppier than I had expected. Let me know if I am doing it right. [[User:John Dvorak|John Dvorak]] 19:43, 23 April 2008 (CDT)
 
[[Category:Rename suggested]]

Latest revision as of 16:56, 4 July 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Connectionist processing models inspired by the architecture of real brains. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Computers [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Substantial addition

I joined CZ a year ago but haven't made many edits. how does this look?John Pate 17:56, 4 July 2008 (CDT)

Article name

Should this perhaps be at Artificial neural network? I did a quick Google search, and a lot of reputable sources seem to use the lower-case. J. Noel Chiappa 15:15, 10 April 2008 (CDT)

I assumed that two weeks was long enough for people to raise an argument for keeping the current name :). I did move it, but it was a lot sloppier than I had expected. Let me know if I am doing it right. John Dvorak 19:43, 23 April 2008 (CDT)